IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com> Mon, 25 May 2020 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <huzhibo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A289D3A0C58 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2020 07:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NlBAwZXs6VQY for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2020 07:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512F03A0C1B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 May 2020 07:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml702-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1468BA7E99363B2D28A2; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:09:29 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.51) by lhreml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:09:28 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.38) by lhreml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:09:28 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.9.194]) by dggemm421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Mon, 25 May 2020 22:09:26 +0800
From: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWKwYxBMyHi7wu+UWbLddMRocvhqi45e5Q
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 14:09:25 +0000
Message-ID: <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAF64CF6F@dggemm509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.202.126]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/OaCYP1sTBmoy7NEx1bIs3zcuKz0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 14:09:38 -0000

Hi 6man, 
I do not support the adoption.


I don't know what is the requirement of the CRH. If CRH is used for steering SR-MPLS traffic over IP network, then RFC8663 has provided a really good solution. If CRH is aiming to address the overhead problem of SRv6, then it is recommended to define a mechanism under SRv6 framework, instead of inventing a huge set of control plane and data plane solutions. Also, we think G-SRv6 for compression has solved the overhead problem of SRv6.[1]

Best regards,
Zhibo Hu

[1]https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-for-cmpr-01

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hinden
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 6:14 AM
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Subject: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting:

 Title:          The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)
 Authors:        R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil
 File Name:      draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21
 Document date:  2020-05-14

 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr

as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.

Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft.  As the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change going forward.

This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020.

The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft.   After discussing with our area directors, we think it is appropriate to start a working group adoption call.  The authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list.

Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list.   That gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group
to work on this.

Regards,
Bob and Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email