RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
"Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net> Sat, 16 May 2020 10:38 UTC
Return-Path: <zzhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9963A0873 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 03:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=DXQIUVBl; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=EGl0I0iO
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s-rC6dKgqyGf for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 03:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 444543A0863 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2020 03:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108160.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04GAc6cb019185; Sat, 16 May 2020 03:38:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=emq/W+jP0oDG9kAfBny029DB6x+x+pzx0ActzNYANsU=; b=DXQIUVBlI/ABUl2520GSmC99arPcaRXG4CqAZKnYJ7qI4Hd4qxRbkwmSIGrN+cZYYW7H xunztCmgXzAcO0uRounYSju4sEq1xsWIKS7BtO2Mc+ukdXjH6gCZtIljv5VvQET3/52R 3BaFOCB9OhLmDuIRWuTlVsQ8z08RSd8rAYYRQtzpJZV3IKBzQxrI/CrCLcVPVEjbY94m kbJ6R5vxdPbbiuaFfIFrtb7qJsZvINnMlmESQcPkY9Jox6JGFhlfaUh9OniavdzwFJjX 3ZV7jjJeNjLfy+cWHwQtkJTzZxc7wncRzvZT/H85zuzUwU4qo3JSz2V2n1HJ91JbGJUr 4w==
Received: from nam10-bn7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10lp2106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.70.106]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 312e3h81af-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 16 May 2020 03:38:05 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=eZzcHbUWBdpdKiS7hDZD34YJde6rIj9iNvSaCYV+sUXscNl/VYhfhVp6TecPPR08qbK8NEXO49RUypfswcRmbGWv1+Ek73UleODMxjBlGc5SaUQT3Bq0N07JPZwk0leVIIraTW6dYUb9WbxPS81V9ydSPBDYORvZNg4Ih0/PQM0TzPS2FDK21IIbmJuY+wmuOuFSbAraKI1kFGxZr0BarWiYFBGJbWoZKZj+c42ompaWwco6jS9SHq3JkTUl4bnf4oPvRnzHHut5tEVjZUKdlWI5bBQL9e3L1BEYM/rVRYAv3l/cOvVSEqpFtFErduns8i7AV+9bxu+5U1518V0qcQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=emq/W+jP0oDG9kAfBny029DB6x+x+pzx0ActzNYANsU=; b=T65us2DPHxuxSUqIt7fO9hpjI9RMcw1N+8Fg/5XA/XjlehtZwGiTiw48qnRXVwo7cy4ZXdGKBxz9dBlO1cDS+1oDdF0vR0nKu4eekVoy3/6DaRgt0g832ybZHhcjs3JgGVdwTO0BHBMwnBW943dwPmSo7G+aLNBAQAUKkJJ3wl6v/jVqWGQw1G35tmGl27Q0kk+RR+TU71cl9K08FSFqTuHAbm+45SFcZRVksDlLI2VxlG8H1jf2zmlbkPK68x/F5NmP1qaqVloxcT8eSzyXkKwzMRhsiO8McIm8jREF8fm4X+CemF/1MK6Z2YTNueSq0frXXnH2zOJXOX9ooY9LVQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=emq/W+jP0oDG9kAfBny029DB6x+x+pzx0ActzNYANsU=; b=EGl0I0iO+gcjFhPB1P9eI/5XAuPl3gN7fbxDLjfH+UCDN7bKo1EC72iopoVITQkwejMgyY7nukJsJet/0I6w8OR8gTiZxfbbu8FGyUwWQG4T0eCZ7p0fqIfzhz5H3XLIbw3J6hS8jv9f7DzLh1R1YZlz3Z8teXcHiAKV8IRwF2A=
Received: from MN2PR05MB5981.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:c3::15) by MN2PR05MB6830.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:1be::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.12; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:37:55 +0000
Received: from MN2PR05MB5981.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8103:732c:491b:acdb]) by MN2PR05MB5981.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8103:732c:491b:acdb%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.010; Sat, 16 May 2020 10:37:55 +0000
From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
CC: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWKwYr4rSxTul/RUulXuZ7GkGJY6ip0ccAgACy6pA=
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:37:55 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR05MB598124A42614C585CD8B6E70D4BA0@MN2PR05MB5981.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2x7hYzQ5kaO_aM9sp4zJ7WgT43FkMRuCTiP8KkZ0w4ELQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2x7hYzQ5kaO_aM9sp4zJ7WgT43FkMRuCTiP8KkZ0w4ELQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-05-16T10:37:52Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=e7e5fa4b-bf12-418a-806b-0fbf58290ed1; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.3.2.8
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [71.248.165.31]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cf843b7e-478d-454a-b1fb-08d7f98531b1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR05MB6830:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR05MB6830583CD7D42B326199D2C5D4BA0@MN2PR05MB6830.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 040513D301
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: C5oVbw/a7Y0pM3XXk5sOtuP36kaTsaiUNsAsE7jevy4mteGzeFp+D3fRu9n0aEEs4j+3akLwmq0xUcSjrD2IGjAPGl2haMxlSLeJwBRSWQl7+ljIN7eKasQjG4wDuGjPftRlTUx9HAG/itr5MyTbbiQCYKcB6frcbnMQQk7PtN4qjZfqLbKPKlKHMM8RhtAAe32/3lJFvJekipM+g+xXtKhp1e7jZL72lCorFvkzHRSpd0BgBjL1AhceLRma5tZrXxGB5ageWiiZSCvMnNRU2faRK/JZKPhv2zrOVh+hfcmhKkkuj6VkJQtN3Fk0phc8KMQnzvMFOL9oZ2UOO0H4kLWVtvA1jq+HMEtMgjrSySEsbAxNKchEPzVPEsHoKNQDnJR4To3ejzR+Irv6lU/VRQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR05MB5981.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(52536014)(4326008)(55016002)(53546011)(2906002)(9686003)(86362001)(71200400001)(26005)(33656002)(478600001)(5660300002)(7696005)(66476007)(76116006)(110136005)(66946007)(66556008)(8936002)(64756008)(66446008)(166002)(8676002)(6506007)(966005)(186003)(316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR05MB598124A42614C585CD8B6E70D4BA0MN2PR05MB5981namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cf843b7e-478d-454a-b1fb-08d7f98531b1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 May 2020 10:37:55.3801 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: UZXGNUDNfoZ2p90RVfn8dKzid8d7bghvU49pt+4dE8tfnI4ib75AdIcu4uaXPiMel/DP/5QKhecV7I5kchf5jA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR05MB6830
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-16_06:2020-05-15, 2020-05-16 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005160095
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/vxHLOUUR3ZzW3YE7Yfln7S7F-Sg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:38:10 -0000
I support the adoption. Mark has said what I wanted to say. It's a simple, clean, useful and generic building block in IPv6, and ready to be worked on by the WG. Jeffrey Juniper Business Use Only From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mark Smith Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 7:53 PM To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org> Subject: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)" [External Email. Be cautious of content] I support adoption. The argument that this working group can't adopt CRH without a whole suite of supporting control plane protocols doesn't apply in my opinion. This working group didn't define OSPFv3, IS-IS extensions for IPv6 or Multi-protocol BGP support for IPv6 itself either - they were developed in other working groups. This working group defines the IPv6 protocol building blocks upon which others can use to build upon. I am willing to commit time to working on CRH, as it solves a problem that has existed since RFC 1883 - the overhead of a source route with a set of 128 bit addresses. It is not a new problem. What is relatively new (3-4 years or so) is the recognition of the significance of the overhead of using 128 bit addresses in a source route, due to SPRING's work. 6man need to solve this problem in a way that is consistent with both the architecture and design of IPv6, in a way that is compatible with the existing, very "brownfield" deployment of billions of IPv6 capable nodes. Regards, Mark. On Sat, 16 May 2020, 08:14 Bob Hinden, <bob.hinden@gmail.com<mailto:bob.hinden@gmail.com>> wrote: This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting: Title: The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH) Authors: R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil File Name: draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21 Document date: 2020-05-14 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XblpMb4jqsF-EHjM1SrhkgeZi4EvdQPastanzPbwlzprRPhYrL8LwSxEFHRbRx9m$> as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors. Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft. As the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change going forward. This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020. The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft. After discussing with our area directors, we think it is appropriate to start a working group adoption call. The authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list. Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list. That gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group to work on this. Regards, Bob and Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> Administrative Requests: https://www..ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XblpMb4jqsF-EHjM1SrhkgeZi4EvdQPastanzPbwlzprRPhYrL8LwSxEFBSoarzw$> --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Heade… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Melchior Aelmans
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tony Przygienda
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Vishal Singh
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael Richardson
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wen Lin
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Parag Kaneriya
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Ro… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compac… Ron Bonica
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Weiqiang Cheng
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Huzhibo
- G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compa… Tom Herbert
- RE: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Huzhibo
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… 刘毅松
- 回复: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- 回复: 回复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Peng Liu
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ahmed Abdelsalam
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Reji Thomas
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Antonio Cianfrani
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Martin Horneffer
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tetsuya Murakami
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kalyani Rajaraman
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael McBride
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ran Pang(联通集团联通网络技术研究 院本部)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kentaro Ebisawa
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… qinfengwei
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Satoru Matsushima
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kamran Raza (skraza)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… 이기훈/책임
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Comp… Dirk Steinberg
- comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: A… 神明達哉
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Francois Clad (fclad)
- Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adopt… Tom Herbert
- Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Com… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Richard Vallee (rvallee)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kris Michielsen
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Robert Raszuk
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… John Scudder
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Adrian Farrel
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jen Linkova
- Re: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6… Erik Kline
- Followup Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The… Bob Hinden