Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

["Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]>]

Several people, including at least one I-D, have asserted that there is 
some abstract requirement for compatibility with SRvc6's SRH.  There is 
no such requirement.  That is not a criterion the 6man group needs to 
consider.  In my personal opinion, it is not even a constraint on what 
SPRING chooses to do.

Yours,
Joel

On 5/28/2020 3:38 AM, Ran Pang(联通集团联通网络技术研究院本部) wrote:
> Hi WG,
> 
> It seems like CRH is not compatible with SRv6 and SRH. We need to 
> discuss how CRH cooperates with uSID, G-SRv6 or other SRv6 header 
> compression solutions before adoption, or whether CRH will cause 
> difficulties in the deployment of G-SRv6 and other solutions. At 
> present, we tend to choose solutions compatible with SRH.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ran
> 
> 
>     *From:* Bob Hinden <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     *Date:* 2020-05-16 06:13
>     *To:* IPv6 List <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     *CC:* Bob Hinden <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     *Subject:* Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
>     This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting:
>     Title:          The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)
>     Authors:        R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil
>     File Name:      draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21
>     Document date:  2020-05-14
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr
>     as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting
>     this document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial
>     suggestions can be sent to the authors.
>     Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last
>     call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g.
>     draft.  As the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the
>     document should change going forward.
>     This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020.
>     The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list
>     about this draft.   After discussing with our area directors, we
>     think it is appropriate to start a working group adoption call.  The
>     authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list.
>     Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as
>     contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list.   That
>     gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group
>     to work on this.
>     Regards,
>     Bob and Ole
> 
> 如果您错误接收了该邮件，请通过电子邮件立即通知我们。请回复邮件到 hqs- 
> [e-mail]，即可以退订此邮件。我们将立即将您的信息从我们的发送 
> 目录中删除。 If you have received this email in error please notify us 
> immediately by e-mail. Please reply to [e-mail] ,you can 
> unsubscribe from this mail. We will immediately remove your information 
> from send catalogue of our.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [e-mail]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>