Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70A93A1071 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pl1DxD79dMMQ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF703A1062 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id l10so5334317wrr.10 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Gk4kTGVo6KXV0TEYm+Q7kfcqqPlLo7VZZJX6edWZPfM=; b=b2ecOw3mfpuHRF/wdfAwQYTtMCHZxETek9kEOXi7nfbHp6Zt95+yISmx5dXXJS7oIK EimS/xKhUREJMcG0RHByd2HAwShRPbEhbWavOVr8/tKjj/NdEUFP4IP+Mx+ILuJ4kLY0 1Sk5CwO29qX+MuP++CXjsuk58FLyG6auMJpFJEQ85Nfh228kMQlhva1vI8K25FyguOAh GgGPX01cUmX/4ltQwFgatJwsqQttd/r6ti9hfmHKeQA/lyUkF53fJejKdNeVikC5TEF0 /Zx9a9En1tVyNg/2q4O0u19SfML5b3HQHPFih6eFYDpujJxhLs0fTN9iy4P6eGGuRji6 l9iw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Gk4kTGVo6KXV0TEYm+Q7kfcqqPlLo7VZZJX6edWZPfM=; b=WaM4j57CRBRGKHb03Il7kBokbIcg/NG86KspLd8sEr/+w4JoVf/MSfxZ/1WLcct3nj L67o35FpUzsunRt/FGH3vmgWz9RnBHyQJ+ihNeGPXlPbWbn1whyyYRHyyQjK2br/YTts pON/xjKHi0EGKGwfPSMULRFV0r9cjmGC/pFiOrxNuCnYC0euE/Uc4TnFeGz1ZpRgJXes hx1mc/r2YvkBGqNhPLNh67gxcAlb1hQDXXwSBvBQesCOPYWaUuJfsNPR4OJmuDE3d48C v2W9ucxWpuVaYC9jwId/59NepJNOsfZ40fODIbnJ7DOJfVQE5FFXMW0kTjh8zJfWg+2F LHHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533x5pf5VmcoRFn0P/UR6f1ZX0JUO9TkXX0pKjMNKAIoucCRcGjM yI/feGrwBxcP+qYDqIJqQ7Tghloz
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzehxP3sMzPifkjbFerBe4aselAiNTVDIkF7IlL88R2mPK9jTlXlGXqU2x7A3uUPQmc7T9oIw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f183:: with SMTP id h3mr11134970wro.403.1590784368026; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:e8f0:836d:9c33:de2? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:e8f0:836d:9c33:de2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n23sm737663wmc.0.2020.05.29.13.32.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 May 2020 13:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <51D3BFD6-16A3-41B3-8F7D-1028E10F9CF7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_843AF9AE-8594-4566-A2C8-CAD2685783BB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Subject: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:32:42 -0700
In-Reply-To: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com>
Cc: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/JXdqF5n6ZSkctsO7wT0xsJPXCdg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 20:32:54 -0000

This email concludes the adoption call on "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)”.

There have been requests to contact the Routing ADs on this topic, this has been started via our Internet ADs.

The chairs and ADs will spend the next few weeks reviewing the responses and make a decision on adoption.

This has been a very heated discussion with several instances of non-constructive behaviour.   Please exercise restraint on future posts.  We note that it doesn’t help to repeat the same thing multiple times or respond to every email.

Bob & Ole


> On May 15, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting:
> 
> Title:          The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)
> Authors:        R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil
> File Name:      draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21
> Document date:  2020-05-14
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr
> 
> as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.
> 
> Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft.  As the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change going forward.
> 
> This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020.
> 
> The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft.   After discussing with our area directors, we think it is appropriate to start a working group adoption call.  The authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list.
> 
> Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list.   That gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group
> to work on this.
> 
> Regards,
> Bob and Ole
> 
>