RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sat, 16 May 2020 00:30 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119D13A0780 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.173, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=L5O59HTF; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=FBLATOL4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YyW_Pe61RJai for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CCE3A077E for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108156.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04G0RRws014059; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:30:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=yWwlUOqf+eiO2m/HJSdjlhr3jiJ/S8n7kFsZf6qNmiM=; b=L5O59HTF3B7v5wSMeijzrNVJdQuYzYz4py6xWHyy3VmfhTZB+Gk5SrwepelcvWh9TW6w QTD+OY1EtJ9vOZWzjbZVPAUlE24rO7/gy/m84f2rXnxN57ifhu0g9gDFyZ5B5cWDuYhu MujYdT1herg88B/ONtO7l3lMv5HE2XmLaZxvYfGounOOfaykHS9SgiQpCPSFlZFfAlHq OFQ/tflTfjxWPho5yGw78AYlqAvRVvds35ZAR5AuCYDmBAuhC4nVbt2H7XlY9F635MAi dDNZ5W2JGWav4DaLYn0yQuvTndQeW2ymst2/eVPsYSzfK3upbN7GCG/ar5y/begep8Pa YQ==
Received: from nam11-bn8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam11lp2172.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.58.172]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 310guknvbx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 May 2020 17:30:47 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HpIvAPaCQHKmvevuQ5Fyke4yVBFEGLgKmpCPUGn5CcnJLRcASoLprvX83o28c+sbf32DBb9r4xjESL+KFK4Rhos/A5PclSrgCe2Loi+wk9GldCSFUf4Z5pkaAoTAtFwxD36D4rLYvn4AiTRpznf19xKpgY7Rwt07euVBBZuelYzvnRM/3Z2D4e3ZfTogDAL2QoCDuYKRKiH5f8ezQAKlUYCBj9UMe1Z0wd9Kk95/sejQWIOzAIize/tl80kUDyVdStyioOA4PQw0y21j+faPM8ePfHQz8IN3gcrF2wc+r6ijJSoGZnS3Mqe6pRSF8CCnXxTWqsyA1ySYXyjLOo+ofA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yWwlUOqf+eiO2m/HJSdjlhr3jiJ/S8n7kFsZf6qNmiM=; b=GBXnUx+HxmyrL3khCFVoDk2u3jJNhfkRrXkXtBLc4vxJetYETyyulsDvDVmCWWaaIH6qrYOstmSgnswz0q1gcijcgCyMwebWx9IBy623Wt2E52esrVZSOV1hlOnJudzGrbxBQlvto3aE7/wSazPG6JcD0bsyQiR8wBQ6nCdUWoJ4JaT9cVx8kZKKoOWsg0ISlBpB6/X3IJi+tOgf0eqqq1LFn75mdxog6c3fDs3O3EbyfNOoWj1IBaTK/AkDtJqJmcpZtJ6hCJ/SwXuyQ/RolJR6B9RqcCYlBYMqfd0EqjD3gnABuUzXwp2RFL+/awKwmoGHVdsqiH27gjIPO3Fsww==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yWwlUOqf+eiO2m/HJSdjlhr3jiJ/S8n7kFsZf6qNmiM=; b=FBLATOL40UGKWKoq0C9o7ct0vnEzwAzoRs0VcqGNw2QZPg1iux/89ylnz/HmtA2eRDCO5onyr5sM0IOE8h+EbNRr26rQFtfm2Mt9/xRlDUrG30b3HHlaiF5EWmTOsBVYJzNEaHb9XZXz73c/4GpisiXa1sNt/RYvvIqnQ8+4VMw=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.178.224.143) by DM6PR05MB5498.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.122.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.11; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:30:43 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.010; Sat, 16 May 2020 00:30:43 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "EXT-Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
CC: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWKwYspvGUDSz9d0mNMkulZqetX6ip0ccAgAADvACAAAKpQA==
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 00:30:43 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB6348682AFD29562ABC97D05EAEBA0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2x7hYzQ5kaO_aM9sp4zJ7WgT43FkMRuCTiP8KkZ0w4ELQ@mail.gmail.com> <E211F16A-3D5F-4D20-BFD5-486A6F9130FB@liquidtelecom.com>
In-Reply-To: <E211F16A-3D5F-4D20-BFD5-486A6F9130FB@liquidtelecom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-05-16T00:30:42Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=7076f806-4047-4d21-89d0-2228a90b6551; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.4.0.45
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: liquidtelecom.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;liquidtelecom.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7a911bbd-700d-4dc5-9d02-08d7f9305eb1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB5498:
x-ld-processed: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB54986FC8EA25CACA8E2E84E3AEBA0@DM6PR05MB5498.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 040513D301
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: zuw4II4vh86cPuUgnxI05OXsJ/ZvFD4/6FjqYby4ebNIJGwazG1Ccg2QKT/OvlCoMZGNICT2372asZx7mNaqFObO3YKvqVhlC6PhEYNrYO57BUSxq7YMDM5CakwEeJAJFCg4GacSSlnUAS9INe1xeF/YjUB4K3BJh2AiXd42yZrmIZ7RtqYiA8wHqDQvWvaY4ZS8gBfYh0zbXzjJP16upPLQJwxjrmVdczZTPMDvEUkW6eFb4y7FRTHDy1bj8qtjZu0bGtSZa1EO470VQE7iJlM+XGcZ2p0q51gmrieHOLh7jV84UZLNDXEo5Vh9icUznbpCiaC4e2GtZKbd5fWsKG4G3eyUU+D4SvvFCTk2SpWOLW9YMu3KTwhW2uI/czNlbnlMymqTKYR4AxdOLgJmBCu/39MHuxBwOHgL7HmY95+RcM3eU5U+CjcAEUzqrdfv
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(136003)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(966005)(76116006)(53546011)(6506007)(478600001)(2906002)(52536014)(66446008)(66556008)(26005)(66946007)(71200400001)(186003)(316002)(66476007)(64756008)(110136005)(7696005)(9686003)(4326008)(55016002)(8676002)(166002)(5660300002)(8936002)(33656002)(86362001)(491001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR05MB6348682AFD29562ABC97D05EAEBA0DM6PR05MB6348namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7a911bbd-700d-4dc5-9d02-08d7f9305eb1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 May 2020 00:30:43.6960 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 7OQR7LADPNrEdaVGu+PL8tBrNN/3wqRI4GGNEhLOtCZldlj6OO5gG9dbf9X4+A/BcH5DX/3QJpqYeOxIxLw4Mg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB5498
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-15_07:2020-05-15, 2020-05-15 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005160001
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/LeaZJxaUgA5Z8QVmZQQjnC9OZw0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 00:30:54 -0000
Bob, This shouldn't be a surprise, but I also support adoption. CRH doesn't break any existing technology. It doesn't consume scarce resource (e.g., Routing type numbers). It isn't so complex that it will consume many review cycles. (Version 21 of this draft is fourteen pages long, including boilerplate, references and lots of whitespace). It has an implementation and an experimental deployment. It is also applicable in many deployment scenarios, some of which are known today, and some of which will be discovered in the future. Ron Juniper Business Use Only From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Andrew Alston Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 8:06 PM To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Cc: 6man@ietf.org Subject: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)" [External Email. Be cautious of content] I also support the adoption of this draft - and echo Mark's sentiments below. It also point out that the argument that because additional protocols may be needed this is out of scope of 6man is specious at best, when we consider it was 6man that developed the SRH, which the same individuals are arguing makes CRH unnecessary, while at the same time developing a raft of additional control plane mechanisms to support the SRH in a series of other working groups. As Mark points out, CRH is a building block - upon which people may build - be in that in the context of standardized protocols or even if they choose to do so, internal applications. The ability of CRH to be used for a raft of different purposes is one the major attractions to me, since it allows innovation to be built on top of it, both in the context of the IETF and outside of the IETF. Hence, I fully support this draft and am proud to have my name on it. Thanks Andrew From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com<mailto:markzzzsmith@gmail.com>> Date: Saturday, 16 May 2020 at 02:53 To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com<mailto:bob.hinden@gmail.com>> Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)" I support adoption. The argument that this working group can't adopt CRH without a whole suite of supporting control plane protocols doesn't apply in my opinion. This working group didn't define OSPFv3, IS-IS extensions for IPv6 or Multi-protocol BGP support for IPv6 itself either - they were developed in other working groups. I to support the adoption of this draft - and echo This working group defines the IPv6 protocol building blocks upon which others can use to build upon. I am willing to commit time to working on CRH, as it solves a problem that has existed since RFC 1883 - the overhead of a source route with a set of 128 bit addresses. It is not a new problem. What is relatively new (3-4 years or so) is the recognition of the significance of the overhead of using 128 bit addresses in a source route, due to SPRING's work. 6man need to solve this problem in a way that is consistent with both the architecture and design of IPv6, in a way that is compatible with the existing, very "brownfield" deployment of billions of IPv6 capable nodes. Regards, Mark. On Sat, 16 May 2020, 08:14 Bob Hinden, <bob.hinden@gmail.com<mailto:bob.hinden@gmail.com>> wrote: This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting: Title: The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH) Authors: R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil File Name: draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21 Document date: 2020-05-14 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RtzalVTSBqPzq9-L37sgXXFTWbf3NWZWySgk3Wb5vTektwLyifAcVwQdBXcHFCyD$> as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors. Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft. As the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change going forward. This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020. The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft. After discussing with our area directors, we think it is appropriate to start a working group adoption call. The authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list. Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list. That gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group to work on this. Regards, Bob and Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> Administrative Requests: https://www..ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RtzalVTSBqPzq9-L37sgXXFTWbf3NWZWySgk3Wb5vTektwLyifAcVwQdBTcs6O-a$> --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Heade… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Melchior Aelmans
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tony Przygienda
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Vishal Singh
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael Richardson
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wen Lin
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Parag Kaneriya
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Ro… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compac… Ron Bonica
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Weiqiang Cheng
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Huzhibo
- G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compa… Tom Herbert
- RE: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Huzhibo
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… 刘毅松
- 回复: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- 回复: 回复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Peng Liu
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ahmed Abdelsalam
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Reji Thomas
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Antonio Cianfrani
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Martin Horneffer
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tetsuya Murakami
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kalyani Rajaraman
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael McBride
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ran Pang(联通集团联通网络技术研究 院本部)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kentaro Ebisawa
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… qinfengwei
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Satoru Matsushima
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kamran Raza (skraza)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… 이기훈/책임
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Comp… Dirk Steinberg
- comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: A… 神明達哉
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Francois Clad (fclad)
- Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adopt… Tom Herbert
- Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Com… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Richard Vallee (rvallee)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kris Michielsen
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Robert Raszuk
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… John Scudder
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Adrian Farrel
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jen Linkova
- Re: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6… Erik Kline
- Followup Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The… Bob Hinden