RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 03:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0BB3A0E44 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=fGVxRdSQ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=CLBMblWs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tzqlLEqRNe3P for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0083A0E3D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10210; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590118702; x=1591328302; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=5Ek4JARyK4Rsf4cqMx5+/b8WHy1vId5UXkzYVilJ/4Q=; b=fGVxRdSQkqbqmu+VXa+fXPwIiigaFObP/v+1BI6BGranPXArZ6fnqYyA LcLhElrb5a+2WHnAHpqwn4VwQ+v3VPnx8RfYKJrfCkJ5xFzRDsjjiiBRq 6kFkoSr1cQWYqrYXuEOS9kpHc7R7i/vUWZX6Wp3sF6Yg6C6I+PWuy4ksv s=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:396xpRymv2flfJ/XCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWDt/pohV7NG47c7qEMh+nXtvXmXmoNqdaEvWsZeZNBHxkClY0NngMmDcLEbC+zLPPjYyEgWsgXUlhj8iK0NEFUHID1YFiB6nG35CQZTxP4Mwc9L+/pG4nU2sKw0e36+5DabwhSwjSnZrYnJxStpgKXvc4T0oY=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DLBQAASMde/4QNJK1mHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGCB4ElLyMuB29YLywKhBqDRgONP4l5iVyEZoFCgRADVQsBAQEMAQEjCgIEAQGERAIXgXskOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhXEBAQEBAxILBgoTAQEyBQELBAIBCBEBAwEBKwICAh8RFwYIAgQBDQUIEweDBYF+TQMuAQ6kNgKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWFOw0Lgg4DBoE4gmOJXxqBQT+BEUOCTT6CHkkCgTABEgEjK4JnM4ItjkaCYQE8hiSKfY9WSgqCU4gpi1GEdYJiiHyQFYICkEmJbYJLkSQCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkiZnBwFTuCNQEBMlAYDZBAg3KFFIVCdAI1AgYBBwEBAwl8ikABgQ8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,420,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="770495164"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 22 May 2020 03:38:21 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04M3cLIv001329 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 May 2020 03:38:21 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 21 May 2020 22:38:21 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 21 May 2020 22:38:20 -0500
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 May 2020 23:38:19 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dJ5gUAwYyXhj/hVuSw4AYigv3sTADu9warw9d4Fkpf5hkzVEWLfdE/9+abwM5LADxIGMgy1d4eRRiFYZZLfA2HJ4yuCNic5Foc1G3HNC4Nf7RyLPuzVCSYspcostKBuTLGjlK36lgjpJrBra07sDf5uq759w4PBjAdVNzWGZCKwNcfb+Q/Ku7Z/x82F8qwSRr+rvqskJ+8bK0LdQrXp00EfJ00AwTHgCRwta1Vg5Aw9o4p+aRdNptCbSR5TNYt0LflfIguqswH67X+jhQw78WQiibzRBZDR2wdmk3rZVU3jFEJUGahwxJpQkfA19Vhq483StD0Qk0BvW10+LkrN6oQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5Ek4JARyK4Rsf4cqMx5+/b8WHy1vId5UXkzYVilJ/4Q=; b=nAhUdqcBI1Hh7dNbq/gXoHqYCfptt58XOy/TEje+af+1Ky/VssmY1NQrAXbgQKobLOTbij3egDtjOQdwByv+LQuqS/29X68zSOk04B/uuFCspcfQI6KIsG/GS2DC8u1+7nNmnGC7c6M26Iv7H1QFjAp/LTCpVp00zToWw5blmRrT83eoPskCeZqpYfZtDyCftwWB/V0R7SXosnjBOC2FjnSqeE34+fE+lBxpIr/K5nEWUneG+F3Fg7pZa4pIYxK7I01FvP9uXOjKTd6TgDfzanU20cntzqB7qsA3OfUIeDYglXmB3G6wkcENUKA39FqaeRS13m++gbvs03p/f1nxjA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5Ek4JARyK4Rsf4cqMx5+/b8WHy1vId5UXkzYVilJ/4Q=; b=CLBMblWsspuP+34DyYbAsxnvknN40SUjDaVi03z2/2oEBJ59ns5KY4IJAM2uhsVxfTcvFZioCuxo07j954f9pIhLBFU0yRWEdEMo8T9EEJbpMejEfa9lDMfFw/EhGasKKbfHjB9MtzQZDzFEGk0ZGEBrX5D+NHrNq9o0jWwgcOY=
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:5f::22) by MW3PR11MB4521.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:55::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23; Fri, 22 May 2020 03:38:18 +0000
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9552:d301:4b19:601c]) by MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9552:d301:4b19:601c%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.020; Fri, 22 May 2020 03:38:18 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
CC: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "martin.vigoureux@nokia.com" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Subject: RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWKwY4liJdYnMUi0GCGHFn1Ke91aiygPMwgACIIoCAAGY0YIAACPkAgAAEl0A=
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 03:38:18 +0000
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB45700984C200278B87FF4B7EC1B40@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com> <MW3PR11MB457033A9113B88BBD95CF39BC1B70@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <0009E75A-3FA1-4C19-8BDE-E0D0EDD530DF@juniper.net> <MW3PR11MB4570DB10F84395039DC1687FC1B40@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <879c8485-0b6a-2444-7cb3-3ae42a71af2c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <879c8485-0b6a-2444-7cb3-3ae42a71af2c@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [72.163.220.29]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e022c384-367d-417d-d0ea-08d7fe0191ac
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MW3PR11MB4521:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MW3PR11MB452194C49AEB5066149F7B54C1B40@MW3PR11MB4521.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 04111BAC64
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: gqkNovHN+YOsjWyNgETOHYPjAw9v62kTmDcAG90p//HR4cx8Vs4BWYJuEzrNcNo2dPWX+jfkXJDfPqK+OX4CEMLW2P0oZOAOpL9TjYj59pMSBlqLU2Jr3KmB5qLgeKnF9z+OrPJ+eK82HL4bLRQfa7L+VVW8RrabASeyPRChEAuqEveCprUJxw39P8kGsb3f+Rf89GaeO0nO7NwaxZcAagpEU9YDyj+STAKazobuE0FP9hLOp61KVxIgzqCHP+9t3vdKz24lvhqa1WprUVrJF048SbIy0whJs+SMJ4gk5pq+9u3hyhvLSQNotYVcMfrEL/GPrJ/QLU52zfVF5Y4wm42AwPfCFOv5GJq6+BhQ3mKlnxWo5+Ffl6JNaQsyLxHv2vYvjg4RGOhxp6HqHN+P4w==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(366004)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(55016002)(52536014)(316002)(966005)(26005)(66556008)(66946007)(76116006)(186003)(54906003)(5660300002)(66476007)(53546011)(7696005)(66446008)(33656002)(110136005)(6506007)(478600001)(9686003)(64756008)(2906002)(8936002)(8676002)(71200400001)(86362001)(4326008)(9326002)(166002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MW3PR11MB45700984C200278B87FF4B7EC1B40MW3PR11MB4570namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e022c384-367d-417d-d0ea-08d7fe0191ac
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 May 2020 03:38:18.7046 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 4O2EqcWylS7UpO+nEh1LIxp5BV2gCSYgYqY1VsI04H85e02Y09uENJYN7Y4DPPMOdrYZE9K+/w/JwjopC3JIJA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW3PR11MB4521
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/rHYxkgR4stpuWPAV5aKOc37YLX4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 03:38:24 -0000
Hi Brian, I am copying Routing ADs to get their perspective and pointing them to my original email objections to this adoption call https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/-ikF-zt_muGxz4exwjx0ZTWZpHY/ Please check inline. -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sent: 22 May 2020 08:45 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com>; John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>; Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)" On 22-May-20 14:52, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) wrote: ... > */So why the rush and the shortcuts – why not the proper documentation before asking for WG adoption?/* Because it's only WG adoption. There is no requirement for supporting documentation at this stage in the IETF process. It's not long ago that I recall an AD saying to a WG that formal requirements and use case documents are usually a waste of time anyway. [KT] I could agree if it is a standalone piece of work and something that is not a new solution/architecture that is going to result in several 10s of drafts/work in other WGs (this is not a guess – the authors have proposed a few such drafts already in routing area WGs that perhaps people in 6man are not aware of). Maybe the IESG has changed its mind about that recently? But in any case, it's a Routing Area decision whether CRH is a good idea; [KT] Agree. And has this question been asked of the Routing Area? If not, is it ok to adopt CRH work in 6man without their decision? If yes, what is their decision? And what were the documents/details that they referred to arrive at such a decision (I ask since the CRH draft seems short on details from a solution perspective to me). Thanks, Ketan 6MAN is not the place for that part of the discussion. Brian
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Heade… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Melchior Aelmans
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tony Przygienda
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Vishal Singh
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael Richardson
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wen Lin
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Parag Kaneriya
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Ro… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compac… Ron Bonica
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Weiqiang Cheng
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Huzhibo
- G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compa… Tom Herbert
- RE: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Huzhibo
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… 刘毅松
- 回复: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- 回复: 回复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Peng Liu
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ahmed Abdelsalam
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Reji Thomas
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Antonio Cianfrani
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Martin Horneffer
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tetsuya Murakami
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kalyani Rajaraman
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael McBride
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ran Pang(联通集团联通网络技术研究 院本部)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kentaro Ebisawa
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… qinfengwei
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Satoru Matsushima
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kamran Raza (skraza)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… 이기훈/책임
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Comp… Dirk Steinberg
- comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: A… 神明達哉
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Francois Clad (fclad)
- Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adopt… Tom Herbert
- Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Com… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Richard Vallee (rvallee)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kris Michielsen
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Robert Raszuk
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… John Scudder
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Adrian Farrel
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jen Linkova
- Re: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6… Erik Kline
- Followup Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The… Bob Hinden