Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Tue, 14 May 2019 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C6C120165 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8MGvHxeVNM6t for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 032F31200B1 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id w1so54602ljw.0 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YkxNflZWTEF8xGZ0RgBfOWfn8f5XsDtP5XDxEBO+h6o=; b=rPexJuFKLPHvxWK0tZDq3wMM+giZX6XISHM42YHUps1wwXoJDLod/FIj72VTMrgwcq V71lwWrQpC3n+KWcmGXi9MisPB0S4r/9HfnBA+l4CBkEt7lQOj6Y194gb9RW7uprvpU7 0wZYCUgxo2X+f0gql4vQMm50zlilcGeSgSKb03+ZLoTVFO8IC2nVtCw4dYMJmJTjz/4o Ix6XNe09CM3ov0Ws3/iXx/VzodSA7lPC8Gzkzlezg2ZRggCJ4UvIZpdTSvofrrrnz72/ RwAcXP4UsfWRhq6kks+XFUgX7EwgK7U+nQIZYKwEkm1gMXjYHKIUk7KFXZfiXLPCJ8wQ Bf4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YkxNflZWTEF8xGZ0RgBfOWfn8f5XsDtP5XDxEBO+h6o=; b=k2yBtm90ibNzc5HUY8gfRvUc66rbIcHddJ+5GeXL7yP8KQeO2xINiMGaE2dUDZiLOq tA4PwUHyAkwIE5CNdTxiqn48RPwciiqdWYad6fq6QSlV2Ylb6H8tKr5p1ReQCavK+yR2 wGqM2+mK+/4hDXRNEPxjmFuAKjSjVd5YGWRtqOZh3oSGXkhMP+55ghLsSa3pAm1O1iES nddTYCraJ8XV9sVEmGIRHa55A5UbMzuA0TJsLwxCCrr4bm6UZE3J2c7yVOaaBKMEGeOp dKMK+f+VSjnEQqFUT/1DuxTJX6uDhwiTK6T5vY7B4tp6jlouFcif7WqoKg3ID6uuZRm4 m9tA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUyG6+EUZk2IfuUjqDVKmq4KijQY/ZeyidylQT/ybqnhekwl3Kw W9X0GkxxgKPePVFVWeXVC4IsiL6VfkEnlK4EUzk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfQSnPGUaN4tWdN+yr/nMDc95fQPJMbxYY7VQymRTZSPwFNDlYmM7ZHqhz8I8bTsSYJn/Czui5eAm6Nhs9MRo=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:96d9:: with SMTP id d25mr16990169ljj.78.1557855476139; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org> <22493.1557605363@localhost> <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com> <20190514011432.bdvcznxca2nvd4ar@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b3e5dafc-50ff-09ef-066a-52c9ba11e563@pi.nu> <6A39D1BB-7F81-4B77-B7A8-8D9EAC142C02@gmail.com> <BE4D4204-6071-459C-AC09-97ED35D17D9E@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <BE4D4204-6071-459C-AC09-97ED35D17D9E@viagenie.ca>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 12:37:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN5QALFEiPnAyTj7m_HAmJpBvouyBvidTrt-=nwSv3Ge1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004449680588dc7e8f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/1Mgo9lNkqwfMSKGlTT-UnlWhQ98>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:38:00 -0000
I think it's extremely useful from the perspective of WG chairs and maybe ADs. But, it's not so much so for the newcomers, in particular in contrast to Quick Connections. For folks that haven't done that event, that might not resonate. But, I spoke to at least a dozen or more newcomers at last quick connections and a fraction of that at the Meet n Greet. You'll see newcomers standing around at Meet N Greet whereas for Quick Connections, they have a place to go and they're not outnumbered by WG chairs. On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:01 PM Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote: > +1. same here. > > While not perfect, overall, probably the best ratio of usefulness. I’m > also doing both: meet some newcomers and also ADs. Sometimes, > interrupting discussion with AD while inviting a newcomer to join. > > Marc. > > On 14 May 2019, at 12:58, Bob Hinden wrote: > > > I like the newcomers reception. I use it to meet actual newcomers, > > and to talk to ADs and other w.g. chair. It’s a much better > > environment for these discussions than the formal welcome reception > > that follows. That is much bigger and noisier. > > > > The newcomers reception is not perfect (what is?), but it works for > > me. I hope we continue it, the alternatives are not as good. One of > > its big values is that is on Sunday before the w.g. meetings start. > > > > Bob > >
- Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105 Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Gorry (erg)
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Linda Dunbar
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Black, David
- reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Carsten Bormann
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Jeffrey Haas
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- RE: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Stewart Bryant
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Loa Andersson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Bob Hinden
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Marc Blanchet
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Salz, Rich
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Pete Resnick
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker