IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: reception not useful for WG chairs

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 14 May 2019 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527071200FF for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vIr1Fc-fKMcy for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF2B312008C for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C150654895C; Tue, 14 May 2019 03:14:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id B136F440041; Tue, 14 May 2019 03:14:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 03:14:32 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
Message-ID: <20190514011432.bdvcznxca2nvd4ar@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org> <22493.1557605363@localhost> <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/7-68Js73aOxg1WqRoW0geVgmgrI>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 01:19:58 -0000

There are a lot of logistics items that should typically be more of
interest to WG-chairs/ADs to allow contributors to be more focussed
on technology.

As Chris said, no such meeting needs (or IMHO should) be closed doors,
just a bit more structure might be helpfull.

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:55:18PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote:
> The issue I have with the entire discussion is that it focuses solely on the
> WG chairs wanting to discuss with ADs during the week-end.
> Let's not forget it's equally important for the community to synch up with
> their WG chairs (and ADs as well).
> The only solution (without multiplying meetings) is that the community + WG
> chairs + ADs attend the welcome reception.
> 
> Regards, Benoit
> > Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
> >      >> We could tether the ADs to tables distributed around the reception room such
> >      >> that they were easier to find, and wouldn't clump together.  That's what made
> >      >> the newcomer's space so useful for WG chairs.
> > 
> >      > And it wasn't just the ADs, in general unless a chair was off talking
> >      > to an inter-area AD, you could also easily find other chairs in
> >      > not-your-area.
> > 
> >      > As far as a "another closed meeting" (mentioned elsewhere), it wouldn't
> >      > *have* to be closed. Just having leadership grouped and easily findable
> >      > is useful. Make it a cash bar instead of free, or if we need to
> >      > incentivize leadership to actually attend (and keep out people just
> >      > looking for free drinks), maybe add a couple drink tickets to the badge
> >      > pickup for leadership.
> > 
> > Should we move it to Tuesday night, in place of the off-site "social"?
> > Could we tether the ADs to couches rather than tables?
> > 
> >      > Call it a leadership reception or something.
> > 
> > Works for me.
> > 
> > --
> > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> >   -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> > 
> > 
> > 

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email