Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Mon, 06 May 2019 17:35 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF3A120047; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdkUWvneJOuB; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A656A1201CC; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id d8so9746433lfb.8; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BCEvFSfckTHRb4tMMwpAh1aT2o8MozJa1FSXw/kpWpg=; b=b9MyBnz81CQ8bp0MsfUN3m43nOHBbdsDbwD3xbkOFwuNhzbK6AqheysYC0Kebuo/fG kuSITWitUIxXT+IPrBx30xtepTSSP1vI6k51uW5W5vhQ/a9BMkUbGQLNx0TS5uhI8P+3 uj5D5uHbTK5MpOtnlDOUez8jVwAWZ5ENcV9boTubi5ONjkqiKhLnqgdXQHMrjXrfu8P/ YKwwqaKvU9GGIFeYaa6Fu76DmP1J6rkZwuWy8Vg7i5ZG+r/ohXTKmhgly1AAvBRgxDcO OE7vGPTFT4DPzAcZ2NLKuHetVUypfviP7PnfjKXBtkSQg8lFuqNy7/UijTdXT5yUPLOu QK5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BCEvFSfckTHRb4tMMwpAh1aT2o8MozJa1FSXw/kpWpg=; b=cW+MBOYzpDKpO0Yp9KjiQpziUSs6+QOfYAqdgAlJgo/MldDxm8itw2XZhUAV63FBni 1JZb2AT2xrhovJ2dkoro/bUlvRxKNjoGtY9tKNegWMDgGOJ/JPc2yLkVbsQgiSlKm4Pz WqdiGqszH/dHVr5O2pCStU1kbfUS6OPHWceJD146NU8qsbApSuE9OPkRKZiHGNfT4Qcg 6YbKF4bbDbcbefIXckXV3tM2j4Lgec9nBnf5JjbVVIVxSRy+dNu6G/tX34ob3UVEpeOR deL1F+3IQWTEamnBwoNHHUhfiN1qZMc677r0q/+XRCwz3cncoo9eJBSrvcPij45wdZf3 K6/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVeU/pyxZAURpBzMtthrCfd/EkCQDkZtJHhiS/rann+j6rVUDzd dx/ySTOUuLKuP1zAdYm0SyGjhAXVbyk6/qbNzTE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwHHBkmI4XmVdoEu/uqbvkBSEtIG4Gl8EyORFnyQ4/K8suqUzp6pWjGs7nPKhA048R5GiU8WBXibPxgMIxvhns=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:7d04:: with SMTP id y4mr13808588lfc.153.1557164120840; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <FFCF22D3-9D23-4B4F-A9B3-F8AA22A09CC0@isoc.org> <56EE9746-6023-4458-B7C2-0C7B4D879BD7@gmail.com> <ybllfzjxzup.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <ybllfzjxzup.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 12:35:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN77xVLZs=V=fszb+8-SENGA9u5SUDzO9_UHZOoFh59SGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000479e4505883b86b6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/4l9aSmhcUpd_yud8gvNdCiQPbCY>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 17:35:25 -0000
ISTM we could just switch around the sessions we had previously. Since the newcomer's meet 'n greet had turned into WG chairs and ADs chatting as opposed to the original purpose, maybe we could put that in the 3pm slot and then put the quick connections in the 4pm slot as has been suggested? Of course, the hard part with that would be getting the WG chairs/ADs to switch modes after the hour. And, I'm not sure Wes' concern about exclusionary. Regards, Mary. On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:25 PM Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote: > Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> writes: > > > Whilst that was not its intended purpose, as a venue for the chairs > > and ADs to find each other before the meeting started and sync up on > > matters that need to be resolved ahead of the other sessions it was > > very useful in making the main business of the IETF meeting more > > successful. > > I think that's a very valid point (along with the dialog that followed, > which was all valid as well), and confirms exactly what the problem was: > it was advertised as a session to help newcomers but wasn't looked at > that way by most senior IETF folks actually going to it. It sounds like > people would actually rather not have the newcomers participate in it at > all but instead having a leadership gathering, which is far outside the > scope of the EDU team and it's purpose certainly. And begins to look > exclusionary too, if you stare at it long enough. > > Side question: if you need (quiet) time to catch up with > chairs/ADs/whatever, why can't you schedule that time instead regardless > of whether there is a restricted-access social or not? If there was a > blank hour in the Sunday agenda why wouldn't that work just as well? > > [the obvious answer to me is that if everyone is in the same room, it > makes bouncing between people better but adds the risk that you still > won't talk to everyone you wanted to because it wasn't a scheduled meet-up] > > -- > Wes Hardaker > USC/ISI > >
- Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105 Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Gorry (erg)
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Linda Dunbar
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Black, David
- reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Carsten Bormann
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Jeffrey Haas
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- RE: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Stewart Bryant
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Loa Andersson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Bob Hinden
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Marc Blanchet
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Salz, Rich
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Pete Resnick
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker