Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Mon, 06 May 2019 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF3A120047; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdkUWvneJOuB; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A656A1201CC; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id d8so9746433lfb.8; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BCEvFSfckTHRb4tMMwpAh1aT2o8MozJa1FSXw/kpWpg=; b=b9MyBnz81CQ8bp0MsfUN3m43nOHBbdsDbwD3xbkOFwuNhzbK6AqheysYC0Kebuo/fG kuSITWitUIxXT+IPrBx30xtepTSSP1vI6k51uW5W5vhQ/a9BMkUbGQLNx0TS5uhI8P+3 uj5D5uHbTK5MpOtnlDOUez8jVwAWZ5ENcV9boTubi5ONjkqiKhLnqgdXQHMrjXrfu8P/ YKwwqaKvU9GGIFeYaa6Fu76DmP1J6rkZwuWy8Vg7i5ZG+r/ohXTKmhgly1AAvBRgxDcO OE7vGPTFT4DPzAcZ2NLKuHetVUypfviP7PnfjKXBtkSQg8lFuqNy7/UijTdXT5yUPLOu QK5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BCEvFSfckTHRb4tMMwpAh1aT2o8MozJa1FSXw/kpWpg=; b=cW+MBOYzpDKpO0Yp9KjiQpziUSs6+QOfYAqdgAlJgo/MldDxm8itw2XZhUAV63FBni 1JZb2AT2xrhovJ2dkoro/bUlvRxKNjoGtY9tKNegWMDgGOJ/JPc2yLkVbsQgiSlKm4Pz WqdiGqszH/dHVr5O2pCStU1kbfUS6OPHWceJD146NU8qsbApSuE9OPkRKZiHGNfT4Qcg 6YbKF4bbDbcbefIXckXV3tM2j4Lgec9nBnf5JjbVVIVxSRy+dNu6G/tX34ob3UVEpeOR deL1F+3IQWTEamnBwoNHHUhfiN1qZMc677r0q/+XRCwz3cncoo9eJBSrvcPij45wdZf3 K6/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVeU/pyxZAURpBzMtthrCfd/EkCQDkZtJHhiS/rann+j6rVUDzd dx/ySTOUuLKuP1zAdYm0SyGjhAXVbyk6/qbNzTE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwHHBkmI4XmVdoEu/uqbvkBSEtIG4Gl8EyORFnyQ4/K8suqUzp6pWjGs7nPKhA048R5GiU8WBXibPxgMIxvhns=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:7d04:: with SMTP id y4mr13808588lfc.153.1557164120840; Mon, 06 May 2019 10:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <FFCF22D3-9D23-4B4F-A9B3-F8AA22A09CC0@isoc.org> <56EE9746-6023-4458-B7C2-0C7B4D879BD7@gmail.com> <ybllfzjxzup.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <ybllfzjxzup.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 12:35:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN77xVLZs=V=fszb+8-SENGA9u5SUDzO9_UHZOoFh59SGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000479e4505883b86b6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/4l9aSmhcUpd_yud8gvNdCiQPbCY>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 17:35:25 -0000

ISTM we could just switch around the sessions we had previously.  Since the
newcomer's meet 'n greet had turned into WG chairs and ADs chatting as
opposed to the original purpose, maybe we could put that in the 3pm slot
and then put the quick connections in the 4pm slot as has been suggested?
Of course, the hard part with that would be getting the WG chairs/ADs to
switch modes after the hour.  And, I'm not sure Wes' concern about
exclusionary.

Regards,
Mary.

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:25 PM Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:

> Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Whilst that was not its intended purpose, as a venue for the chairs
> > and ADs to find each other before the meeting started and sync up on
> > matters that need to be resolved ahead of the other sessions it was
> > very useful in making the main business of the IETF meeting more
> > successful.
>
> I think that's a very valid point (along with the dialog that followed,
> which was all valid as well), and confirms exactly what the problem was:
> it was advertised as a session to help newcomers but wasn't looked at
> that way by most senior IETF folks actually going to it.  It sounds like
> people would actually rather not have the newcomers participate in it at
> all but instead having a leadership gathering, which is far outside the
> scope of the EDU team and it's purpose certainly.  And begins to look
> exclusionary too, if you stare at it long enough.
>
> Side question: if you need (quiet) time to catch up with
> chairs/ADs/whatever, why can't you schedule that time instead regardless
> of whether there is a restricted-access social or not?  If there was a
> blank hour in the Sunday agenda why wouldn't that work just as well?
>
> [the obvious answer to me is that if everyone is in the same room, it
> makes bouncing between people better but adds the risk that you still
> won't talk to everyone you wanted to because it wasn't a scheduled meet-up]
>
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> USC/ISI
>
>