Re: reception not useful for WG chairs

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 14 May 2019 05:51 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40215120074 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VI5sEl_HLGwl for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06988120025 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [119.94.160.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D43133F5AF for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 07:51:16 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
To: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org> <22493.1557605363@localhost> <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com> <20190514011432.bdvcznxca2nvd4ar@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <b3e5dafc-50ff-09ef-066a-52c9ba11e563@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 13:51:12 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190514011432.bdvcznxca2nvd4ar@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/4wwQ0YP8i3Pr3xFR7Kgksi9f4OI>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 05:51:21 -0000

All,

I feel a bit split about this discussion

- the reception fill a purpose, e.g. coordination with authors,
   reviewers, other chairs and and staff. I actual expect people
   that hold some position (what so ever) to attend the reception
   and feel that if people start opting out of the reception that
   would be bad thing

- actually the newcomers reception, gives me most of the opportunity
   to talk to other chairs

- if we add a Tuesday meeting (for ADs and chairs only) that could
   from some perspective be a good thing, but since it is Tuesday night
   half the meeting is done

/Loa

On 2019-05-14 09:14, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> There are a lot of logistics items that should typically be more of
> interest to WG-chairs/ADs to allow contributors to be more focussed
> on technology.
> 
> As Chris said, no such meeting needs (or IMHO should) be closed doors,
> just a bit more structure might be helpfull.
> 
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:55:18PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> The issue I have with the entire discussion is that it focuses solely on the
>> WG chairs wanting to discuss with ADs during the week-end.
>> Let's not forget it's equally important for the community to synch up with
>> their WG chairs (and ADs as well).
>> The only solution (without multiplying meetings) is that the community + WG
>> chairs + ADs attend the welcome reception.
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>> Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
>>>       >> We could tether the ADs to tables distributed around the reception room such
>>>       >> that they were easier to find, and wouldn't clump together.  That's what made
>>>       >> the newcomer's space so useful for WG chairs.
>>>
>>>       > And it wasn't just the ADs, in general unless a chair was off talking
>>>       > to an inter-area AD, you could also easily find other chairs in
>>>       > not-your-area.
>>>
>>>       > As far as a "another closed meeting" (mentioned elsewhere), it wouldn't
>>>       > *have* to be closed. Just having leadership grouped and easily findable
>>>       > is useful. Make it a cash bar instead of free, or if we need to
>>>       > incentivize leadership to actually attend (and keep out people just
>>>       > looking for free drinks), maybe add a couple drink tickets to the badge
>>>       > pickup for leadership.
>>>
>>> Should we move it to Tuesday night, in place of the off-site "social"?
>>> Could we tether the ADs to couches rather than tables?
>>>
>>>       > Call it a leadership reception or something.
>>>
>>> Works for me.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>>>    -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64