IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 06 May 2019 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69FD12022D; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PA7xiaP2SgRF; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6307812019F; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id h17so757105pgv.0; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sD25s0tI0fUEGi1SmDge/ro8JlI/VknQYlpaUlveCko=; b=fadd+Dtyrg7eEGFc6bVlcDZeQvrAs8yHp8lDuB3GDWALZN76BE8dm8Bmbq2V8ygNQw HKepE9oo8THVNQ4ylHrfQp5xjLdygZq35tWCMEfUb+T/eR221YvLympVAw4PgJOOZbT3 zZcElvVghAGND5aU4Ny7L4QeNAxwgrPbQIyOOsnByrA7MahIL/av9Ytn34knIa1o3A7n b+GCckGQhgttxHnXDRIsvWJUvD72t+G7wVz+UTS2BEAb0LJoeyw69gZvfaoHKEUJfD+S Vnz+FzeDcVRnybmG3BgrCOxh9IZJAWsL3Er/uXgIqPhu652Jcu+hCFyBdj1ri3qpKGIu GVOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sD25s0tI0fUEGi1SmDge/ro8JlI/VknQYlpaUlveCko=; b=cJPe88ueTp39p65SZO0uyecHKaO4ugEsIf9s+IeNYPKeOFXHTVFIphKnEwuu6mXHr9 pyCmrAEp9C97C0IodiyfazDWhUqOWUio5iYCLpoP8gmHNJ6kVKekKqw6s+/LBwqoWoQ3 w/txSQanx9fftzRl6jymftzmPXRgtusFlJHr1tsekAYDTWBsqQ3mvurdUsNw7jFFG6x2 +YBHtC5KJDNp3BLNGXsYeO7IJ4c4891dxIZIOn1N76ToQlEul42FSF6inLU/A5Kjh9pA VcPYH19V+iDCZiOv+zrK3bBMsw3LK/YY4QAw5jext+kZAD8OZrmCmqozXJb63CczwZhQ JiuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWXSjUB7+Te+wmLN6RaWT7w30qJwG2HQG/J2Hv1SBTuPVlUsnjE mjPQ4raYTjzzxvJeCoFliWSAtnOI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzE+627Bfl3O/otFedDXyCjVVibn151PBRtpfQamAweZWd+JcBLvlPLl32c6oruEj9wsFA98g==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:5994:: with SMTP id k20mr34344404pfj.150.1557161306519; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8801:d000:34:5c44:34bd:4926:4ccd? ([2600:8801:d000:34:5c44:34bd:4926:4ccd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y20sm13892033pfe.188.2019.05.06.09.48.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 May 2019 09:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-0F3D8AC8-A585-4518-BA7E-DE5B4F73579F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F5148a)
In-Reply-To: <2493376E-3A12-4023-8EA8-F5712338718A@mjmontpetit.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 09:48:24 -0700
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B0226367-966C-48BC-9A1C-50D187327148@gmail.com>
References: <FFCF22D3-9D23-4B4F-A9B3-F8AA22A09CC0@isoc.org> <56EE9746-6023-4458-B7C2-0C7B4D879BD7@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B3B367D@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <2493376E-3A12-4023-8EA8-F5712338718A@mjmontpetit.com>
To: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/AgPJwQh5Efm6RUrMM0c5d3Z5K4U>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 16:48:42 -0000

From my perspective, Sunday being a very busy day that other groups (in my case, ISOC events and Root-Ops meetings) commandeer to drop meetings on, adding yet another Sunday meeting sounds like a terrible idea. It’s also a busy day for the IESG and IAB.

And what WG Chair dinner? There used to be a bar event after plenary on Wednesday, but it seems like a long time ago.

Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...

> On May 6, 2019, at 8:09 AM, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com> wrote:
> 
> Well it seems this begs for an informal meeting of chairs. Right now the WGs chairs have a dinner and us RG chairs have ours. And there is the Wednesday lunch but it is not really a networking event  (and I am not criticizing it - it made me recognize the usefulness of github) . Maybe we need an informal meeting? The Systers have a cross WG/RG meeting that is successful. And I usually host a cross-WG/RG party but it’s not enough. Maybe a Sunday meeting at the time of the newcomers and ahead of the general get together would be good?  I would welcome cross-fertilization between IRTF-chairs and IETF-chairs.
> 
> Just a Monday morning idea!
> 
> Marie-Jose Montpetit, Ph.D.
> Affiliate, MIT Media Laboratory
> mariejo@mit.edu
> marie@mjmontpetit.com
> +1-781-526-2661
> @SocialTVMIT
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 6, 2019, at 10:57 AM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 10:49:22AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm hearing that the Sunday Reception is inadequate for WG chairs to
>>> catch up with Area Directors, and that many people would like some structured
>>> time in which to be able to do that.
>>> 
>>> Personally, I've found the reception to be very much useless for awhile.
>>> Long food lines, and then food which I don't really like.  I've been skipping
>>> it, or showing up at the very end just to say hi.
>>> And now we schedule the HotRFC more or less on top of the end of the
>>> reception.
>> 
>> IIRC we got some explicit feedback that overlapping HotRFC with the tail
>> end of the reception was a feature.
>> 
>> -Ben
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email