Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 14 May 2019 17:29 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB3412013F for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RtLtIb5pfCtR for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6231120137 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id r10so15267820otd.4 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2JN+3HcXzX9rE6Ev8B4VHGz2COKkB9y+dsWlwGechCg=; b=kTzmFxjBdtdd4ByPXLvBY1v+CP1wkHIeHho0C4vRKx2Q97BPnJ/EJSbtQkx581PaMv hhnxSm5KxrnizXK76IfoA2qiY5fXbF35ye4e1VDoYN9NglNTLqR2+Z+L97zzhKH6fmkx 9AcUfRrQyQ3PQSgW0wThxYUwrM+eKWCxB1FDBTFTmYUHVXEAwkz/xF1wv8tPfzVsbuhc WfB9knKycKUwKrXXLd3ahfuXrmHMsDkWlZYP8BaUoIw+uE6nz4O5JwxxYreSNtgDOjQU 8V9xmVUHEESVrM0pVyz118BRLINVGruDIkgFV44QvcbI7EmG1vJLFNwZpMUFmdNbNaMm Ql+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=2JN+3HcXzX9rE6Ev8B4VHGz2COKkB9y+dsWlwGechCg=; b=O0Dboh5EAbQ57ZXxZZtu+weR632wPUbH1QcWElmf32Q0q/Tgs8yh1VY1YsaHfsm9iP RiDuqpN2oqW+ZdLXB0u5mKcHKlm3wRzdiV+SQF1VuAK0DRlfu5fSeCulmIsw+FbmjeBX UIrDlGDPhhOlUEFzNmFIUbd+8PKJp0t0oJ38UTK9OMsA6ozTl68DUVl/mhC5xYjY5leu GZJDfYmn81mrmyylDLzFo2xXGY4A1sylq4jmrt/wWVHv2UW5MVYXR8DBHFIoQCE536nn JBeKNUIS0Cr3nRChcdqZ+SB+lOT3B02AEOST90/RudNkAByOTuV3pk/v0hsulXoRtrHB tHQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZluI0t6UUvrCCmearhFFquWRE/TyMwB75pjRI0zhY8CWGvQXp YJC9oWBT349/gHh1BUlo+7VSLmZWKpzF5UObZprKL+ad
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyOteY8bnDoMoHERp83VW6wKkr/t/JXPKZuh6rKsAjuwLEFKFYvIJ3UK8FIuOr7lCzmeGiSZgLpER6ck9YdW8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1383:: with SMTP id d3mr2469936otq.319.1557854940897; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org> <22493.1557605363@localhost> <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com> <20190514011432.bdvcznxca2nvd4ar@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b3e5dafc-50ff-09ef-066a-52c9ba11e563@pi.nu> <6A39D1BB-7F81-4B77-B7A8-8D9EAC142C02@gmail.com> <BE4D4204-6071-459C-AC09-97ED35D17D9E@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <BE4D4204-6071-459C-AC09-97ED35D17D9E@viagenie.ca>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 13:28:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5iJ3HYktKBSi34ny-WxAt_bHcT=iRrpPfOvMtBVExbBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
To: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d24150588dc5e48"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/DNzGATr8B9x7ERRAIf32Y2q-4zo>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:29:04 -0000
I have also found it useful and did try to talk to newcomers when I was an AD. The chairs and ADs did try to introduce new people around as relevant, of course there was some chatting between old timers. It was a useful format for me. Best, Kathleen On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:01 PM Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote: > +1. same here. > > While not perfect, overall, probably the best ratio of usefulness. I’m > also doing both: meet some newcomers and also ADs. Sometimes, > interrupting discussion with AD while inviting a newcomer to join. > > Marc. > > On 14 May 2019, at 12:58, Bob Hinden wrote: > > > I like the newcomers reception. I use it to meet actual newcomers, > > and to talk to ADs and other w.g. chair. It’s a much better > > environment for these discussions than the formal welcome reception > > that follows. That is much bigger and noisier. > > > > The newcomers reception is not perfect (what is?), but it works for > > me. I hope we continue it, the alternatives are not as good. One of > > its big values is that is on Sunday before the w.g. meetings start. > > > > Bob > > -- Best regards, Kathleen
- Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105 Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Gorry (erg)
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Linda Dunbar
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Black, David
- reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Carsten Bormann
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Jeffrey Haas
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- RE: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Stewart Bryant
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Loa Andersson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Bob Hinden
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Marc Blanchet
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Salz, Rich
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Pete Resnick
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker