IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: reception not useful for WG chairs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 12 May 2019 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CC0120047 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 May 2019 17:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QTtD4Bij1MXb for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 May 2019 17:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E85B8120145 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 May 2019 17:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E953826B; Sat, 11 May 2019 20:42:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id ADBFD10E8; Sat, 11 May 2019 16:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5CFE9E; Sat, 11 May 2019 16:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
In-Reply-To: <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org>
References: <FFCF22D3-9D23-4B4F-A9B3-F8AA22A09CC0@isoc.org> <56EE9746-6023-4458-B7C2-0C7B4D879BD7@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B3B367D@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 16:09:23 -0400
Message-ID: <22493.1557605363@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/5DXk6wT2kGOuubqxN2JcEpb439I>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 00:43:18 -0000

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
    >> We could tether the ADs to tables distributed around the reception room such
    >> that they were easier to find, and wouldn't clump together.  That's what made
    >> the newcomer's space so useful for WG chairs.

    > And it wasn't just the ADs, in general unless a chair was off talking
    > to an inter-area AD, you could also easily find other chairs in
    > not-your-area.

    > As far as a "another closed meeting" (mentioned elsewhere), it wouldn't
    > *have* to be closed. Just having leadership grouped and easily findable
    > is useful. Make it a cash bar instead of free, or if we need to
    > incentivize leadership to actually attend (and keep out people just
    > looking for free drinks), maybe add a couple drink tickets to the badge
    > pickup for leadership.

Should we move it to Tuesday night, in place of the off-site "social"?
Could we tether the ADs to couches rather than tables?

    > Call it a leadership reception or something.

Works for me.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email