IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: reception not useful for WG chairs

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 13 May 2019 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABA812001E for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VByBE0uv_yKq for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE456120233 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1623; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1557770126; x=1558979726; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hQEthvfFhBXbKSzJ66y49FIgmtxZBTalT+Zsi6IQAJ4=; b=ellSDj1Z1Exig0gjN6iPqpuNud7xrOeVVIdur0K2nMHOs54vMPjAI32o Sov9d27+rtqzoB9oRQ4D2kfO09M+a5WznJ0l7TqNA9/AsdeVKzI0AKKvB opjMyUkaaKQjArdaqGAfn+F73FdUY+bQdPEF2SSbiK2YP5/jMwhwu97VO g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BPAADMrtlc/xbLJq1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVAIBAQEBCwGDfSiEEWKIGYt3LZpOCQEBAQ4vAQGBS4J1AoI2NwYOAQMBAQQBAQIBBG0ohUsBBSMVQRALGAICJgICVwYBDAYCAQEQB4MHggusHoEvhUeDKIFGgQsoAYtlgUA/gTiCaz6ENIMaglgEkx2UOAmCC5JWBhuMLYk/jDKNJ4gHgWUigVczGggbFYMnkFM9AzCQDwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,465,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="12058795"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 May 2019 17:55:22 +0000
Received: from [10.61.240.115] ([10.61.240.115]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4DHtLkA024848; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:55:21 GMT
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <FFCF22D3-9D23-4B4F-A9B3-F8AA22A09CC0@isoc.org> <56EE9746-6023-4458-B7C2-0C7B4D879BD7@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B3B367D@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org> <22493.1557605363@localhost>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 19:55:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <22493.1557605363@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.240.115, [10.61.240.115]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/ChoJFCTgpNruft9Pyij_dftizMo>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 17:55:29 -0000

The issue I have with the entire discussion is that it focuses solely on 
the WG chairs wanting to discuss with ADs during the week-end.
Let's not forget it's equally important for the community to synch up 
with their WG chairs (and ADs as well).
The only solution (without multiplying meetings) is that the community + 
WG chairs + ADs attend the welcome reception.

Regards, Benoit
> Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
>      >> We could tether the ADs to tables distributed around the reception room such
>      >> that they were easier to find, and wouldn't clump together.  That's what made
>      >> the newcomer's space so useful for WG chairs.
>
>      > And it wasn't just the ADs, in general unless a chair was off talking
>      > to an inter-area AD, you could also easily find other chairs in
>      > not-your-area.
>
>      > As far as a "another closed meeting" (mentioned elsewhere), it wouldn't
>      > *have* to be closed. Just having leadership grouped and easily findable
>      > is useful. Make it a cash bar instead of free, or if we need to
>      > incentivize leadership to actually attend (and keep out people just
>      > looking for free drinks), maybe add a couple drink tickets to the badge
>      > pickup for leadership.
>
> Should we move it to Tuesday night, in place of the off-site "social"?
> Could we tether the ADs to couches rather than tables?
>
>      > Call it a leadership reception or something.
>
> Works for me.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>   -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email