reception not useful for WG chairs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 06 May 2019 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641D41201E4; Mon, 6 May 2019 07:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EWs22I6b5ssi; Mon, 6 May 2019 07:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A59120224; Mon, 6 May 2019 07:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E50B38263; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:48:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 49DD6CBC; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:49:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47658A8A; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:49:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: reception not useful for WG chairs
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <FFCF22D3-9D23-4B4F-A9B3-F8AA22A09CC0@isoc.org> <56EE9746-6023-4458-B7C2-0C7B4D879BD7@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B3B367D@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 10:49:22 -0400
Message-ID: <1756.1557154162@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/nLmOdhgnIgpB2rhb9b6AFdgHbqw>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 14:49:29 -0000

I'm hearing that the Sunday Reception is inadequate for WG chairs to
catch up with Area Directors, and that many people would like some structured
time in which to be able to do that.

Personally, I've found the reception to be very much useless for awhile.
Long food lines, and then food which I don't really like.  I've been skipping
it, or showing up at the very end just to say hi.
And now we schedule the HotRFC more or less on top of the end of the
reception.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [