IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: reception not useful for WG chairs

"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 14 May 2019 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE7312015C for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bKUHA70bqIs for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB13120172 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id d13so12730805qth.5 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sb72w+ijWJLFBdq/XzSv5tt2/p3WjPmhvp5LHL9HLfo=; b=vYlE4Flp/AQ+NyFDu8WSo4HTpgPWTb3l30NtcRvYC3KdMXaupcTe93W0Zl2CAvNkvP 9YwzFFflwtdqr0Dm6Fr9hkKYTy9UV81R1lVs25hBkzeklVH2t/3KxFhVSNtekCRXQvsD 3rxZCaVvWCSFzWhBPy2H+3lmxTeLRFJGan+SAuWXv/ztN4UN5yuiPjv8Nm1/qTTr+g0Z RSSFwHUbijBAf3jivCZH3PL8rrGsZ7WB0C1kxWKqksxN1IysrxFu1V8Jw8yumY1Zz5ug 6TNHnzrCsEpEsEyvyKb11C96nr43QbgNCAmfIYdxFzVGsT2nwV+S0sQEVxud0/53cWNE b2ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sb72w+ijWJLFBdq/XzSv5tt2/p3WjPmhvp5LHL9HLfo=; b=cJ6pSmN9pCJTPaxyB7i1iVk2LtdXoEDfK9P1eIsmhkFG9sI+FbSyob94RVebx1/nZx KkN+MezeVLb19s4eavqV6Yjokq+YLb/n5joOzXMpo4dPxVISOx8Msasdvz3+SU6MZELa jUqz6/c6RPAWLRgEn9XilSKmhz0dNxKQbnU/MI5HyGNrfrWOzxnnakYIV5p+MBS6Dpna mLmmrEWPWMs5ezC0XyKhdrqD2xSAMa+PzeRD5wXtOdHk2cBwynFub/mQXyHLmrg2+gd4 IXcnZWFcVtng/Ib0EdthP8+bQpUg4B83Ww8xj3qfYx8m6U5kvHb//FyT8jKrlq6vh88a a9ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV75ooFlmgtQ4dhyTI7PjmYqtTzgOFisRnpNwv9XOOMwovdwWxE Y0IcUf60N21hzt+qT1Z8A8eiyg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzb1r/IotYvxEhPbCyy6rRsSVe++oq4H2wYBSI9uZhKLw3Yr+u//x0EPJsM6Rqly2G4GBYCHw==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:22b4:: with SMTP id p49mr28122026qtc.208.1557853256200; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.60] (modemcable138.218-70-69.static.videotron.ca. [69.70.218.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm698270qkh.87.2019.05.14.10.00.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 May 2019 10:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 13:00:53 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5632)
Message-ID: <BE4D4204-6071-459C-AC09-97ED35D17D9E@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <6A39D1BB-7F81-4B77-B7A8-8D9EAC142C02@gmail.com>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org> <22493.1557605363@localhost> <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com> <20190514011432.bdvcznxca2nvd4ar@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b3e5dafc-50ff-09ef-066a-52c9ba11e563@pi.nu> <6A39D1BB-7F81-4B77-B7A8-8D9EAC142C02@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/1e7vrLbbbkqTNvEnPDpuTmRHyTM>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:00:59 -0000

+1. same here.

While not perfect, overall, probably the best ratio of usefulness. I’m 
also doing both: meet some newcomers and also ADs. Sometimes, 
interrupting discussion with AD while inviting a newcomer to join.

Marc.

On 14 May 2019, at 12:58, Bob Hinden wrote:

> I like the newcomers reception.  I use it to meet actual newcomers, 
> and to talk to ADs and other w.g. chair.   It’s a much better 
> environment for these discussions than the formal welcome reception 
> that follows.  That is much bigger and noisier.
>
> The newcomers reception is not perfect (what is?), but it works for 
> me.  I hope we continue it, the alternatives are not as good.   One of 
> its big values is that is on Sunday before the w.g. meetings start.
>
> Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email