IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: reception not useful for WG chairs

"Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Mon, 06 May 2019 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B797D1201D3 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6pZxAkgj5Cz3 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA300120233 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id j6so15516839qtq.1 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pYyf4+0XLr5OxEbhD/egPbt4rngS570Q59WwjF5aqeg=; b=MROsWedHy9npcEKrNxbUv4yFe8Lnly9i/44yWtPY25qYWbFRaR9xpGAkqG0wIDM80D Pt4xWwTROH2NcL6yP6gaM4I2ayp7aazaWn6g05ZmfHB6QPKZN23ZUfuPH/0UcgNL5b4v N+SMA49Mm6wv54Vp33hXIxh9o2o2S2XLOAWlzQzBc2LVa8u9NrWK7Vlb6F+rEddK9js+ g8FhcCjpcUckH0J2zBrZt6hm7Dv40pfuJ5jBncFViwZy5EZZVI1dX+4Hx+g4KmGDzjda tTQ6Vljj3jUv0A25yiACx2DvEQvChNGziLGwDjzCGRua7Nri526X5XY/CUn+1M9tTkN4 CMkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pYyf4+0XLr5OxEbhD/egPbt4rngS570Q59WwjF5aqeg=; b=HZpHcb5vzTcGk3TC825hnNoHglmFnztTDSY6RlrNooqFUIxkt8zWm6HJL9yYueAC94 cAF4K8VWT52ceX/jkKZbGvb8SEZ0f1b+LE0Ni5/E/MrGy5VzXBf8fwGFO7g9MxLylVoM qD3mnyaPx+2JOerKxyhdBp8LopGK6rsoPoZOScY5owsBRgVWysbCDE66tl2rg4Qq6K0L R2iQV80RK8VdSiAiNAgJ2MSZbv9X0nF5LNEVqaDegx0Oe0Vi6CmQRPUD8pY1+ZZfMjIt Wj6cxRjM7bxvKXv/PnFab0TBKA87OwmRqNN4H3D3iUW56zqoRKQYq804M2X4AeiA+zqs cBrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWVU7TZMjE5rC+TROqduYv3O0aze3yxYnqDGHCU0D3EYqE9Pe+O P9fx6ji5W/y3h7+cCexvznw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyPSXs4Mf066nN0tm3zv9yNQfxZRGucmGGEysCDWZ71elxnp18ZNZ4Rl/60raiI58N8Z+FOqQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:bb96:: with SMTP id i22mr2300258qvg.129.1557161342798; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.36.141] ([2001:4878:a000:3000:fc0f:3cc8:c5a8:a6fc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h123sm6169058qkf.5.2019.05.06.09.49.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 May 2019 09:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 12:49:00 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5594)
Message-ID: <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <23268.1557158691@localhost>
References: <FFCF22D3-9D23-4B4F-A9B3-F8AA22A09CC0@isoc.org> <56EE9746-6023-4458-B7C2-0C7B4D879BD7@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B3B367D@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_77352C82-3877-4D70-8FEB-0ECD8AAF970A_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/JEJgkl-q_Or04Rhem3e5_bV_9n0>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 16:49:17 -0000

On 6 May 2019, at 12:04, Michael Richardson wrote:

> But, more to the point, it pretty much guarantees that the reception 
> is not
> useful for WGchairs to connect to ADs, since some of those will now be 
> at
> HotRFC.

I’m open to moving HotRFC to another time if that is where this 
conversation goes but I don’t think that HotRFC’s 1hr overlap of the 
2hr receptions ‘guarantees’ WG chairs will not be able to connect 
with ADs.

--aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email