IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs

Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com> Mon, 06 May 2019 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F90120265 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9tllz8BUDkY for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F2B12022A for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id z128so5661528qkb.6 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=q+33JJIUpbBfrw7fDjq0WkCWzjEAHzplY+87V4yF2bM=; b=GYQ2V3V1kwch4fxdbJ2dhFS4c+lwUTmRjDmZSabRtyZ7fshhyFVU72ESxVOCatBfHL D481pUIefCc1URElxvdRpWWShRW5cTKqCwM8wj0kccar9rKFo8hnb0UOXTIlQ4wBIkxE 18D4W1QVkGPLmFUS591T9eCk8De1zz+2prF+ij1rx6p8JzWC40tItQhG9rw25CqG276q jb9+wS0psXiOTrN22Nglft8sBHw3BocLKCSJRVgaOQzwBrSjdcsy3u9+GAfu8zn6/rj7 YlfAWdJl1C1iHfFIrldqeRphY6pGfSU9BnvEGmaOQf7hmJnmatRroAyEMBTrNFgFRDrn s+/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=q+33JJIUpbBfrw7fDjq0WkCWzjEAHzplY+87V4yF2bM=; b=ckTCzDPNGxs2KFBQmVMF5Q4vmVfNeHAOzyCYIOQKivay7pc1BQgNpiOeUXD3hJzIbo KWix0kwbILCaA11qtWWNf+moKWPZeq9ihj/z5R8aqKkNEajqFzYKThve6I8GnySnrurm oS6/yd2uq4LL0S7iAgGdUpD/twFhNlJkr+rx8CQIwX8GsuOC8MaGpaWw9zGLVR391T6v HpCBmpTmLJW7bb79BRkH0cFnuyqHarN08QsQirWLWXYKco+ZgaM/lj2RMcEUzDCo22sl ltaMLOnncZ7lMjFcnmIuDd4UotKLCB0Hck03Roc1asCik8/NAupa/W3+NxReLxHnD9JU ySjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWotcDqDew+9GpCUA0NtHqJyxyUI/ITmfhx30Zo+cV36XhlWj5B yZEyFwhiCBbKUufwbBAjbsmEdg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyka7VPq5DLmBqZ80rjkmFp00g/3N8l0oAwDedFg6UfbcHTtkKzbRFew+4wRZ+0PDpQXhhcqg==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:8544:: with SMTP id h65mr20908412qkd.84.1557161390579; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from heidi-lamarr.fios-router.home (pool-173-48-150-213.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [173.48.150.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k190sm5767075qkd.28.2019.05.06.09.49.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 May 2019 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
Message-Id: <71836991-9259-413E-95C9-F1D4C94B60F1@mjmontpetit.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_821FEAC6-F6BC-480D-A830-0B9B619EC080"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 12:49:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <B0226367-966C-48BC-9A1C-50D187327148@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <FFCF22D3-9D23-4B4F-A9B3-F8AA22A09CC0@isoc.org> <56EE9746-6023-4458-B7C2-0C7B4D879BD7@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B3B367D@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <2493376E-3A12-4023-8EA8-F5712338718A@mjmontpetit.com> <B0226367-966C-48BC-9A1C-50D187327148@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/LhoF1niCM_CHRJ-n8viienMc0s8>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 16:50:07 -0000

We have a RG dinner on the Wednesday. And I am under the belief that that WG chairs meet before that.

mjm
Marie-Jose Montpetit, Ph.D.
mariejo@mit.edu
marie@mjmontpetit.com
+1-781-526-2661
@SocialTVMIT



> On May 6, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> From my perspective, Sunday being a very busy day that other groups (in my case, ISOC events and Root-Ops meetings) commandeer to drop meetings on, adding yet another Sunday meeting sounds like a terrible idea. It’s also a busy day for the IESG and IAB.
> 
> And what WG Chair dinner? There used to be a bar event after plenary on Wednesday, but it seems like a long time ago.
> 
> Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
> 
> On May 6, 2019, at 8:09 AM, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com <mailto:marie@mjmontpetit.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Well it seems this begs for an informal meeting of chairs. Right now the WGs chairs have a dinner and us RG chairs have ours. And there is the Wednesday lunch but it is not really a networking event  (and I am not criticizing it - it made me recognize the usefulness of github) . Maybe we need an informal meeting? The Systers have a cross WG/RG meeting that is successful. And I usually host a cross-WG/RG party but it’s not enough. Maybe a Sunday meeting at the time of the newcomers and ahead of the general get together would be good?  I would welcome cross-fertilization between IRTF-chairs and IETF-chairs.
>> 
>> Just a Monday morning idea!
>> 
>> Marie-Jose Montpetit, Ph.D.
>> Affiliate, MIT Media Laboratory
>> mariejo@mit.edu <mailto:mariejo@mit.edu>
>> marie@mjmontpetit.com <mailto:marie@mjmontpetit.com>
>> +1-781-526-2661
>> @SocialTVMIT
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 6, 2019, at 10:57 AM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu <mailto:kaduk@mit.edu>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 10:49:22AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I'm hearing that the Sunday Reception is inadequate for WG chairs to
>>>> catch up with Area Directors, and that many people would like some structured
>>>> time in which to be able to do that.
>>>> 
>>>> Personally, I've found the reception to be very much useless for awhile.
>>>> Long food lines, and then food which I don't really like.  I've been skipping
>>>> it, or showing up at the very end just to say hi.
>>>> And now we schedule the HotRFC more or less on top of the end of the
>>>> reception.
>>> 
>>> IIRC we got some explicit feedback that overlapping HotRFC with the tail
>>> end of the reception was a feature.
>>> 
>>> -Ben
>>> 
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email