Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
"Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Tue, 14 May 2019 17:10 UTC
Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF1012022B for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUlPxXNL8IAl for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A83812023E for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id i26so2546197qtr.10 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P6LqrYXluA3cpeSlxIpJIDojsR4nIHJVWCLUxxCRuLg=; b=f4Dq2h4ltnpniNAga2n+H47C4H86qgjmeBo+qFvFTHZW5whFjZNyp8D+Oy5Ki+NVQq DVsseRMgVaBjgI1MFRmmPMmF9AGrnyOVGtYQOD6YQTIjCY4TXCrplrbD9a3q5BjO/uKs ndYZVwoiNTD9GE/zY2k4TSEP2xZSawvsMTu/LJC+L4QCgJ7YgJM7G0AOOR+c6sbkAEG2 UZGK9S4EiHfk3uAs24Sv8bsVu/YaT8DvpAlMRRqcz6z633GBo0XcoIoFUqSOsT+R9N1g hUJrj65iViKjWAWaUK47JH3RrmAU7ndKlbjzANubSGfP6A/+1akZdRIM8R3tZnO07maP xNug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P6LqrYXluA3cpeSlxIpJIDojsR4nIHJVWCLUxxCRuLg=; b=mXeMSVOGojOrWCQrLp9tDFn7ymw7Rs+Nvpdxw1Oy+KxH1hir8O6Pfwznh+eyQ8ps4N 7APtABUUrdOR1VJSBAk8TDuVDbtBy4oh0MmVmobZC10FQp3XF6Y2GYx1s8z54KIyt+S6 seE0Wt5Y4bfoPDIlchB+WZfDaN5IJQ/m9ehDwU7t+XxEfvka2KrhJo8PGhaG6f5eSbxc bykBvSeitHb0j5mZWKF2aJuKamWkKmxtyy7tQ5Xh7PgLkGm1kxSsBV+Ge5W4+5Tl4vqH oW2O6byvq6IkNhDnJX9wmLuxMRzc5RHGcnB9K2PVqFRWMWJuz2NfQHXBP+5Ang5AY45I a2Tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVMnwfPtcJ4FWBziITQf1H2DouUzSTGVvB7y9AUf6O1OaBm49J1 vQfmMz/SnnhLfrsjSDRlG3Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz7TErvJHzGvEXnx0wLGMbBZfke8LDbxVADVFMGCSp7W9TwVMxsh9Q83LdDfspFDkUqRhSyyw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2655:: with SMTP id v21mr19915865qtv.70.1557853826853; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.33.100] ([2001:4878:a000:3000:c464:1a4b:e9f3:dbf6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v22sm9689075qtj.29.2019.05.14.10.10.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 May 2019 10:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 13:10:24 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5632)
Message-ID: <F77B4025-7AD1-46C0-A6BD-AEC2877D0AEE@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD86E244-47DA-4525-BB44-0F1C293CE0D0@cisco.com>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630556890@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1756.1557154162@localhost> <20190506145757.GC19509@kduck.mit.edu> <23268.1557158691@localhost> <DE8DA2AF-9666-42D1-BFC0-2E207B1D6862@gmail.com> <30ecf2f6-9c9b-1eca-3ba6-8319829c2ffc@cisco.com> <26329.1557173327@localhost> <sa6mujuj873.fsf@chopps.org> <22493.1557605363@localhost> <da3c395d-3fef-dfb3-4e46-939eee5eeb7c@cisco.com> <20190514011432.bdvcznxca2nvd4ar@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b3e5dafc-50ff-09ef-066a-52c9ba11e563@pi.nu> <6A39D1BB-7F81-4B77-B7A8-8D9EAC142C02@gmail.com> <BE4D4204-6071-459C-AC09-97ED35D17D9E@viagenie.ca> <4AC557B0-67B9-442B-824D-F522703AEB72@akamai.com> <CD86E244-47DA-4525-BB44-0F1C293CE0D0@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_7742539E-8ACE-4A57-BE1E-BA05730B5D68_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/rCoG1Gj3rc7yWo62nsI2OmvKhOw>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:10:33 -0000
+1 On 14 May 2019, at 13:09, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Absolutely - who decided to discontinue the Newcomers (and Oldtimers) > Reception anyway? Seems pretty short-sighted. > Acee > > On 5/14/19, 1:07 PM, "WGChairs on behalf of Salz, Rich" > <wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rsalz@akamai.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On 5/14/19, 1:02 PM, "Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> > wrote: > > +1. same here. > > While not perfect, overall, probably the best ratio of > usefulness. I’m > also doing both: meet some newcomers and also ADs. Sometimes, > interrupting discussion with AD while inviting a newcomer to > join. > > Marc. > > On 14 May 2019, at 12:58, Bob Hinden wrote: > > > I like the newcomers reception. I use it to meet actual > newcomers, > > and to talk to ADs and other w.g. chair. It’s a much > better > > environment for these discussions than the formal welcome > reception > > that follows. That is much bigger and noisier. > > > > The newcomers reception is not perfect (what is?), but it > works for > > me. I hope we continue it, the alternatives are not as > good. One of > > its big values is that is on Sunday before the w.g. meetings > start. > > > > Bob
- Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105 Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Gorry (erg)
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Linda Dunbar
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Black, David
- reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Carsten Bormann
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Jeffrey Haas
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- RE: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Stewart Bryant
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Loa Andersson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Bob Hinden
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Marc Blanchet
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Salz, Rich
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Pete Resnick
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker