Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 May 2019 04:55 UTC
Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5DF120098 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2019 21:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iHa51ejaWYUn for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2019 21:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E5F512002E for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2019 21:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id r7so16541265otn.6 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2019 21:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Yv+D34ibia4OGX2EoZAqqDvVf17m/ZJ8uXn4dcQSm8s=; b=sGgTlOmFhuLt63Z1zh52Uqs0+ZLI08GzS24SVrZJoFljrWTKaamqRsiM/ggzgdGNwN 2jLax08Yee4RCo89VktFZy7RLtVHs6MZjTUGkvlPCW0pdjfH4f231hTqFP3zk9Dp575Y FdzTllA4gI2OrYBuJfzRpTstuxEY4RngoRjomgt8rD+pmrwDVTbYIIHQNpe1Ga98u3y7 8g3UrD7p0xsPr3yH76mHYPqFMLHfqkEZ9Rk1TZdS+0iAv+Y7A2K9AapsmpNdBU53Ow7k Gq24EWeQ+WIzC9KQsJZ6yrqWf6GO+F7OYf83xA0LDo5xi0oCL1dlawX2q9Gp2twp7QaE o86Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Yv+D34ibia4OGX2EoZAqqDvVf17m/ZJ8uXn4dcQSm8s=; b=azs+p7z55QJWGY2XILOT948b1KUXwvovvpiKThMCR7U0hCk1Ba5j20Af5QjcxXczin FsWyrbBwIrKnNUc0OOpT0A1TdWYXcbGggIAM3gPTQi+5CRXyIqc8Gx/cQ0rh58EdG1xW KyvjShfivc0p3dN/2eHLzdc+fZhYvfU4Sli22qinczAXVXprdQDBdL5Ye5kHHB/ymxiI H+shGfHXrLSPvIjAOjxvlBTYWPyrscJ1MHDxVFmU91QpHXbtrKyu68830cQax/O1WjZG +XDLrz4Q0Nkzk+lSFJmTjeWJOg6ew2zxx0lMATiwA3g07th41SzsavVqJ+00RstRj3oD Agiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVg6vSlghPTGIfWLYBB1S28HR5r2s+tPCs7d0oFi1qfOZ+RaPh/ ZFW/Vm4NpCGpRTFqDiCNBsBKfeEy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy8BGMAaMfnxD7Ulwvuz8giVMB1yHudNWh1Nv+aKl7AbrE/vqnoL6ZRwnPCUmdz7NYI2tE3kw==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6246:: with SMTP id i6mr58359otk.270.1559019352466; Mon, 27 May 2019 21:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5903:df16::1020? ([2600:8802:5903:df16::1020]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e15sm4553876otl.9.2019.05.27.21.55.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 May 2019 21:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: reception not useful for WG chairs
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G5027i)
In-Reply-To: <C96F4AB2-2BA4-4441-B399-FD671C5A6179@episteme.net>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 21:55:50 -0700
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DA04C718-B639-474F-B94D-90BE26ABE24C@gmail.com>
References: <6A39D1BB-7F81-4B77-B7A8-8D9EAC142C02@gmail.com> <BE4D4204-6071-459C-AC09-97ED35D17D9E@viagenie.ca> <4AC557B0-67B9-442B-824D-F522703AEB72@akamai.com> <CD86E244-47DA-4525-BB44-0F1C293CE0D0@cisco.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E1893EC@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <ybly336par7.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363056B432@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <sa636letawy.fsf@chopps.org> <20190517030636.wee2o3keivhuubqe@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <yblef4xpu9t.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <20190517060017.v3ftgkn3tztc2ix6@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <C96F4AB2-2BA4-4441-B399-FD671C5A6179@episteme.net>
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/Mop8F8vP3u1CeBe44NYon_25rMM>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 04:55:56 -0000
You’re correct, Pete. Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways... > On May 27, 2019, at 4:26 PM, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> wrote: > > Catching up on an old message I just noticed: > >> On 17 May 2019, at 1:00, Toerless Eckert wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 09:41:34PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: >>> I object strongly to offering some people and not others free drink >>> vouchers. That sets up a class system, and "We reject kings". >> >> Well. We do honor the work of IESG, NomCom and other bodies with more >> and better food than attendees already if i am not mistaken. > > This may be a "convenient fiction", but I always understood that the breakfasts for IAB and IESG are provided not to honor them, but rather to allow them to do the necessary work they do for the rest of us over a meal instead of making them wake up at even more ungodly hours for their meetings. And usually the meals they get for breakfast have a more limited menu than the hotel restaurant when breakfast is included for everyone. > > pr > -- > Pete Resnick http://www.episteme.net/ > All connections to the world are tenuous at best >
- Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF 105 Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Gorry (erg)
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Linda Dunbar
- RE: Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities for IETF… Black, David
- reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Carsten Bormann
- Re: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [irsg] reception not useful for WG chairs Jeffrey Haas
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- RE: [IAB] Change in Sunday Newcomer Activities fo… Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Benoit Claise
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Stewart Bryant
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Loa Andersson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Bob Hinden
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Marc Blanchet
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Salz, Rich
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- RE: reception not useful for WG chairs Black, David
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Aaron Falk
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Mary Barnes
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Toerless Eckert
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Christian Hopps
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Michael Richardson
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Pete Resnick
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Fred Baker
- Re: reception not useful for WG chairs Wes Hardaker