IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> Fri, 04 August 2006 16:49 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G92rE-0004y8-14 for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:49:08 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G92pf-00034x-2D for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:47:33 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74Gkqh8015930; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:46:52 -0700
Received: from m.wordtothewise.com (goliath.word-to-the-wise.com [208.187.80.130]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74GkeNE015896 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:46:40 -0700
Received: from [10.3.2.25] (184.word-to-the-wise.com [208.187.80.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by m.wordtothewise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED2FFF93 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <44D37376.4020408@mtcc.com>
References: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com> <44D0E259.7040400@mtcc.com> <20060802165510.X1168@simone.iecc.com> <44D160BD.7080209@mtcc.com> <20060802223619.E86316@simone.iecc.com> <44D24A20.6050109@mtcc.com> <20060803153457.X33570@simone.iecc.com> <44D36203.2060803@mtcc.com> <20060804112731.I21459@simone.iecc.com> <44D36B4A.2050903@mtcc.com> <20060804114527.Y27352@simone.iecc.com> <44D37376.4020408@mtcc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <1F0984B3-DF97-43EB-B982-4272EC121D36@blighty.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 09:45:24 -0700
To: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3

On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:

> John L wrote:
>
>>   I REALLY do not want an SSP that says "I sign everything, and  
>> here is my estimate on a 0 to 10 scale of how much you should care."
>
> I assume that you'd complain if it boiled down to a single bit?
>
> 0: "mail from this domain may transit manglers, adjust accordingly"

0: "I sign some mail"

> 1: "the signature should always be intact"
>

1: "I sign all mail"

Cheers,
   Steve


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email