Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 04 August 2006 20:15 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G964T-0005od-AP for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:15:01 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G964R-0007VR-UO for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:15:01 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74KA4am013295; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:10:04 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-68-122-35-59.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.35.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74KA0xc013269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:10:00 -0700
Message-ID: <44D3A974.5070704@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:09:24 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
References: <20060804173538.54245.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060804173538.54245.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8



>> What I have yet to hear is any sort of consituency for a monolithic
>> "i sign everything" beyond the statements@bigbank scenario. 

For reference, we probably DO need to do some consensus assessments.  I think
that there have been some clear preferences by the working group, but I think
they have not been formally stated, assessed and accepted by the working group.

d/

-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html