RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements

John L <johnl@iecc.com> Sat, 05 August 2006 05:25 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9Eex-0000ni-90 for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 01:25:15 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9Eet-00010u-Rp for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2006 01:25:15 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k755KXVQ013690; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 22:20:34 -0700
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k755KPC3013674 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 22:20:26 -0700
Received: (qmail 4705 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2006 05:13:20 -0000
Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 5 Aug 2006 05:13:20 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Aug 2006 05:13:20 -0000
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 01:13:19 -0400
From: John L <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Bill.Oxley@cox.com
Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements
In-Reply-To: <BB621D48443A854A89D86528F915864C0215F772@CATL0MS02.corp.cox.com>
Message-ID: <20060805003253.E13340@simone.iecc.com>
References: <BB621D48443A854A89D86528F915864C0215F772@CATL0MS02.corp.cox.com>
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228

> How does the post office do it? It receives mail from other countries
> and determines what kind of stamps official franking etc to either
> deliver or return to sender unopened.

International postal mail is one of the worst possible analogies for 
Internet mail.  It's a closed system consisting of only 190 post offices, 
each of which is a national monopoly.  All the security is at the 
perimeter, i.e., when you mail a letter to England, the USPS checks that 
the stamp is real, but when the USPS hands it to RM, RM assumes it's OK. 
There's a complex settlement scheme to share postage revenue when the 
bilateral flow of mail is unbalanced which has no online equivalent, thank 
goodness.

And, of course, there's no identity security at all on postal mail.  I can 
write "Bill Oxley" as the return address on a letter, mail it, and no post 
office will notice or care.

Although it is completely irrelevant to Internet mail, the international 
postal system, which goes back to the 1870s, and its history are quite 
interesting.  See http://www.upu.int.

> DKIM is an electronic stamp, SSP (to me) appears to be the franking
> system.

This is so wrong I don't know where to start.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html