RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
Arvel Hathcock <arvel.hathcock@altn.com> Sat, 05 August 2006 00:12 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G99lo-0002so-4x for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:12:00 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G99lm-00059N-Oi for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:12:00 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k750BHwm011999; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:11:18 -0700
Received: from c3po.altn.com (c3po.altn.com [65.240.66.134]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k750BBSw011974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:11:12 -0700
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=altn.com; s=c3po; l=400; x=1155319829; q=dns; h=DomainKey-Signature:Received:Date:From: Subject:To:Organization:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:Message-ID; z=DomainKey-Signa ture:=20a=3Drsa-sha1=3B=20s=3Dc3po=3B=20d=3Daltn.com=3B=0D=0A=09 c=3Dnofws=3B=20q=3Ddns=3B=20h=3Dfrom=3Amessage-id=3B=0D=0A=09b=3 DRFBzao7jmbK/JSFQaQtLedpRnRy4bcILxY/vLss5h1y7xo32XwiYxY3+8bij=0D =0A=093s8lA3W63xNR89gEAry3+3nx8l+5t2L0MOxqWfXiK9PKydzZiPed4S8Qq= 0D=0A=091Q3yxaAwYyPDGwG3Sq81L1jFM9wc0oFWSLoHkeP3Tqd/vOeUutN0uE=3 D=3B|Received:=20from=20ARVEL.altn.int=20by=20altn.com=0D=0A=09( Cipher=20TLSv1=3ARC4-MD5=3A128)=20(MDaemon=20PRO=20v9.0.6)=0D=0A =09with=20ESMTP=20id=20md50001712104.msg=0D=0A=09for=20<ietf-dki m@mipassoc.org>=3B=20Fri,=2004=20Aug=202006=2019=3A10=3A29=20-05 00|Date:=20Fri,=2004=20Aug=202006=2019=3A10=3A00=20-0500|From:=2 0Arvel=20Hathcock=20<arvel.hathcock@altn.com>|Subject:=20RE=3A=2 0[ietf-dkim]=20A=20more=20fundamental=20SSP=20axiom|To:=20"'ietf -dkim@mipassoc.org'"=20<ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>|Organization:=20 Alt-N=20Technologies|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Type:=20text/pl ain=3B=20charset=3Dus-ascii|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Reply-To:=20arvel.hathcock@altn.com|Message-ID:=20<MDA EMON-F200608041910.AA1025596md50000023428@altn.com>; b=fa/4t3DeF 34bMcPvCK/Rexit9QfSepZQdMAnoAWhQyHovHq7rrwTV96f3Gz1sXAW+9wpD2vgN 2LmksqMzK1ZhXQpnFe+wcKuSM0SC5lcdCL/keyqSKJrQOrjXjXXlPOoPI+WZqtwh MDWchJZicqGFf0YiV6YS866GP3fs+i2e6U=
DKIM-Signature: v=0.4; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=altn.com; s=c3po; l=400; x=1155319829; q=dns; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Organization:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:Message-ID; z=Do mainKey-Signature:=20a=3Drsa-sha1=3B=20s=3Dc3po=3B=20d=3Daltn.co m=3B=0D=0A=09c=3Dnofws=3B=20q=3Ddns=3B=20h=3Dfrom=3Amessage-id=3 B=0D=0A=09b=3DRFBzao7jmbK/JSFQaQtLedpRnRy4bcILxY/vLss5h1y7xo32Xw iYxY3+8bij=0D=0A=093s8lA3W63xNR89gEAry3+3nx8l+5t2L0MOxqWfXiK9PKy dzZiPed4S8Qq=0D=0A=091Q3yxaAwYyPDGwG3Sq81L1jFM9wc0oFWSLoHkeP3Tqd /vOeUutN0uE=3D=3B|Received:=20from=20ARVEL.altn.int=20by=20altn. com=0D=0A=09(Cipher=20TLSv1=3ARC4-MD5=3A128)=20(MDaemon=20PRO=20 v9.0.6)=0D=0A=09with=20ESMTP=20id=20md50001712104.msg=0D=0A=09fo r=20<ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>=3B=20Fri,=2004=20Aug=202006=2019=3A 10=3A29=20-0500|Date:=20Fri,=2004=20Aug=202006=2019=3A10=3A00=20 -0500|From:=20Arvel=20Hathcock=20<arvel.hathcock@altn.com>|Subje ct:=20RE=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20A=20more=20fundamental=20SSP=20axiom |To:=20"'ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org'"=20<ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>|Org anization:=20Alt-N=20Technologies|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Ty pe:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3Dus-ascii|Content-Transfer-Encodi ng:=20quoted-printable|Reply-To:=20arvel.hathcock@altn.com|Messa ge-ID:=20<MDAEMON-F200608041910.AA1025596md50000023428@altn.com>; bh=tiC1O/gfcqcI3819GmcRyH3DBQ3Pe8bx0bXLFf0ahVo=; b=mxz5X8pXvydsW bEP78VpXoaY2bOAmCf1zjmgXdV9VV+38WdGJrTuotHiWbknAqmpmVu9lX6YSKmGY 8SfsLCOy1cIwALEH0JfMnBZFIlQi+DIyirXpQ219XuxjAPOVyhAYEHUlR/ybzxYg YaltrTvo9EA5px7inQIFjjgj9Fv6+Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=c3po; d=altn.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=RFBzao7jmbK/JSFQaQtLedpRnRy4bcILxY/vLss5h1y7xo32XwiYxY3+8bij 3s8lA3W63xNR89gEAry3+3nx8l+5t2L0MOxqWfXiK9PKydzZiPed4S8Qq 1Q3yxaAwYyPDGwG3Sq81L1jFM9wc0oFWSLoHkeP3Tqd/vOeUutN0uE=;
Received: from ARVEL.altn.int by altn.com (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (MDaemon PRO v9.0.6) with ESMTP id md50001712104.msg for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:10:29 -0500
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:10:00 -0500
From: Arvel Hathcock <arvel.hathcock@altn.com>
Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
To: "'ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org'" <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-Priority: 3
Organization: Alt-N Technologies
X-Mailer: Outlook Connector for MDaemon 2.1.2d
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Authenticated-Sender: arvel.hathcock@altn.com
X-HashCash: 1:21:060805:md50001712104::lzuS8v5WjEGeGEzs:000064cM
X-Spam-Processed: c3po.altn.com, Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:10:29 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-Return-Path: arvel.hathcock@altn.com
X-Envelope-From: arvel.hathcock@altn.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Message-ID: <MDAEMON-F200608041910.AA1025596md50000023428@altn.com>
X-MDAV-Processed: c3po.altn.com, Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:10:29 -0500
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sb7.songbird.com id k750BBSw011974
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: arvel.hathcock@altn.com
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
> Yes but.. I don't think that everyone is going to be aware of the risk > or ignore it thinking it can't happen to them. Quite the contrary really, I'd think. And anyway, are we to remove from our work even useful things on the basis that there are some who might not understand it? Surely not. We should just do our best to document what we can to help them. -- Arvel _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Paul Hoffman
- [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom wayne
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Paul Hoffman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment Bill.Oxley
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment John L
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom wayne
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John Levine
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Bill.Oxley
- [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Mark Delany
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Mark Delany
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements John L
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardiz… Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Michael Thomas
- [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy John L
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM Client Policy Requirement Douglas Otis
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Bill.Oxley
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Mark Delany
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardiz… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardiz… Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Jeff Macdonald
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Jeff Macdonald
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Graham Murray