IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

"Hector Santos" <hsantos@santronics.com> Fri, 04 August 2006 21:19 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G974Q-0002jP-9d for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:19:02 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G974N-0006WZ-JG for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:19:02 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74LIAdT022231; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:18:10 -0700
Received: from winserver.com (ntbbs.winserver.com [208.247.131.9]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74LI3Yu022172 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:18:04 -0700
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.1.451.8) for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:20:09 -0400
Received: from hdev1 ([72.144.136.116]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.1.451.8) with ESMTP id 1480193110; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:20:08 -0400
Message-ID: <013801c6b80b$460dac10$0201a8c0@hdev1>
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@santronics.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, John L <johnl@iecc.com>
References: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com><44D0E259.7040400@mtcc.com> <20060802165510.X1168@simone.iecc.com><44D160BD.7080209@mtcc.com> <20060802223619.E86316@simone.iecc.com><44D24A20.6050109@mtcc.com> <20060803153457.X33570@simone.iecc.com><44D36203.2060803@mtcc.com> <20060804112731.I21459@simone.iecc.com><44D36B4A.2050903@mtcc.com> <20060804114527.Y27352@simone.iecc.com><44D372D4.3040305@cs.tcd.ie><20060804131856.H49810@simone.iecc.com> <44D3A9D7.7090208@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:16:34 -0400
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: "John L" <johnl@iecc.com>

> John L wrote:
>
 > It may sound like I'm channelling Dave here, but I don't want to put
> > anything into a protocol that doesn't have a straightforward operational
> > value, and I don't think that "stir it into the mix in spamassassin" is
> > straightforward.
>
> It ain't me.  It's a long-standing pattern of what gets deployed and used.
>
> So if there is any channeling, we are both doing it, on behalf of
> the God of Successful Protocols...

Yes, that's true, but we are here fixing things up.  :-)

This time around, lets be even more conservative and not pass on the future
DKIM "Ignore failure" debt to our children.

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com





_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email