Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk> Sun, 13 August 2006 08:15 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCB7s-0000w7-3L for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 04:15:16 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCB7p-00043Q-Ne for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 04:15:16 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7D8DIHI023817; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:13:20 -0700
Received: from newton.gmurray.org.uk (newton.gmurray.org.uk [81.2.114.237]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7D8D9NK023789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:13:11 -0700
Received-SPF: pass (newton.gmurray.org.uk: domain of graham@gmurray.org.uk designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=newton.gmurray.org.uk; client-ip=127.0.0.1; helo=newton.gmurray.org.uk; envelope-from=graham@gmurray.org.uk; x-software=spfmilter 0.97 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.0.0;
Received: from newton.gmurray.org.uk (graham@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newton.gmurray.org.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k7D8Ciqf025086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:12:44 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v0.5.1 newton.gmurray.org.uk k7D8Ciqf025086
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmurray.org.uk; s=in200507; t=1155456764; bh=OHc5Dh7pU/wWWP4zg8OjEl1dAGs=; h=Received: X-Authentication-Warning:X-Hashcash:From:To:Subject:References: Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=e Hd4F/gdr5rLQ5ejNiuSJDtaitGr5G5tKSRs/ZqNofR3gVOXdYiaNyqzXjoCyJW7mOYZ 1o1E8E5Z4hiyDHKNVA==
Received: (from graham@localhost) by newton.gmurray.org.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k7D8CflK025082; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:12:41 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: newton.gmurray.org.uk: graham set sender to graham@gmurray.org.uk using -f
X-Hashcash: 1:22:060813:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org::siXTeibm/6PJu0U1:0000000000000000000000000000000000000009ROn
From: Graham Murray <graham@gmurray.org.uk>
To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
References: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com> <44D0E259.7040400@mtcc.com> <20060802165510.X1168@simone.iecc.com> <44D160BD.7080209@mtcc.com> <20060802223619.E86316@simone.iecc.com> <44D24A20.6050109@mtcc.com> <20060803153457.X33570@simone.iecc.com> <44D36203.2060803@mtcc.com> <20060804112731.I21459@simone.iecc.com> <44D36B4A.2050903@mtcc.com> <20060804114527.Y27352@simone.iecc.com> <44D37206.7070209@dcrocker.net> <44D37621.2020905@mtcc.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:12:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <44D37621.2020905@mtcc.com> (Michael Thomas's message of "Fri, 04 Aug 2006 09:30:25 -0700")
Message-ID: <877j1dcava.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> writes:

> I really don't buy John's small lawfirm scenario unless he can swear
> that none of their users or correspondents use Yahoogroups;

As Yahoo is supposed to be one of 'sponsors' of DomainKeys and DKIM,
should they not put their own house in order and fix Yahoogroups so
that it does not break DKIM? 
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html