IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 02 August 2006 05:48 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G89bH-000403-Vp for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 01:48:59 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G89VE-0008Gj-9P for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 01:42:45 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k725V2wu024359; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:31:02 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-68-122-118-34.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.118.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k725UvAu024335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:30:58 -0700
Message-ID: <44D03872.5090601@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:30:26 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
References: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22


John L wrote:
>   SSP exists so that receivers can make better decisions about
>   handling their incoming mail.
> Corollary:
>   Information not useful to receivers doesn't belong in SSP.


For this initial round of SSP, the wording of the Corollary probably needs to be:

    Information that is not widely viewed by receivers as essential doesn't
    belong in SSP.

Hence, any suggestion to include something into SSP needs to say 1) how we know
that it is of immediate and substantial benefit to receivers, and 2) why we are
 certain that there is a broad base of receivers who believe they need it
(immediately.)

d/
-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email