Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

["Hector Santos" <[e-mail]>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arvel Hathcock" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom


> So, focus narrowly on what receivers would find of immediate benefit
> for an initial round of SSP work which will entice senders to provide it.
> I hadn't looked at it quite that way before.  This approach does have
> several advantages -- not the least of which is the potential to
> actually complete something useful in our life-times.

Man, you made me laugh spit on my screen!! <g>

I just want to know what receiver hat I am today?

A - Developer of SMTP software or related APIs?
B - Administrator of installed SMTP software or related API?
C - Hosted Domains using results created A and B?
D - End Users using results created A and B?

I wish to remind you of what you said nearly 1 year ago, that really strikes
at the core:

 > Before responding, I want to clear up something that's been bugging
 > me a little lately.  I've seen the unfortunate habit of speaking
 > about something called "SSP" as if it were foreign to or a mere
 > enhancement of DKIM.  In my view, SSP is DKIM.  It is the heart
 > and soul of the proposal. [1]

Ahem brother!!

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com


[1] http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2005q3/000239.html



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html