Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 04 August 2006 20:58 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G96ko-0007zL-Rh for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:58:46 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G96kn-0003bu-FS for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:58:46 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74Kvv2i019174; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:57:58 -0700
Received: from fasolt.mtcc.com (adsl-216-102-208-10.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.208.10]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74Kvek4019115 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:57:40 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=0.4; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=521; t=1154725029; x=115 5589029; c=relaxed/simple; s=dicks.drop.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subje ct:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=F rom:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com>|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20 A=20more=20fundamental=20SSP=20axiom|Sender:=20|To:=20Damon=20<deepvoice@gm ail.com>|Cc:=20Douglas=20Otis=20<dotis@mail-abuse.org>, =20=0A=20DKIM=20List =20<ie tf-dkim@mipassoc.org>|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|MIME-Version:=201 .0|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DUTF-8=3B=20format=3Dflowed; bh =WxskL1yFTXFfEL5BGIJUAY0Pacgd9ygCp1dl3r17XGk=; b=YJgdvOGe8MUUbaTgmRgZGXdhPfzexY6e/WPUktNtdjwtZc/yIbEpTHzp1pMeVzDXvD7qSqv1 EMGcTO++qeSsOLC1HcRICLy9+bZNLX2d/207K++KU1j/92ROhhE/DZ4Y;
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=521; t=1154725029; x=1155589029; c=re laxed/simple; s=dicks.drop.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Tr ansfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:Michael=2 0Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com>|Subject:Re=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20A=20more=20fundamen tal=20SSP=20axiom|Sender:|To:Damon=20<deepvoice@gmail.com>|Cc:Douglas=20Oti s=20<dotis@mail-abuse.org>,=20=0A=20DKIM=20List=20<ie tf-dkim@mipassoc.org>|Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit|MIME-Version:1.0|Con tent-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DUTF-8=3B=20format=3Dflowed; X=v=3Dcisco .com=3B=20h=3D9J+1R8q3OVg0TDo2cZEg7LPE+qc=3D; b=FydPdrs5kpU50Iz05N6a+7FLGNX1DYQc6cFO3jrktxqVzUmD8rgmYXgRZe9EW6ojzPkSSvgE OAaXGmlHoePvnyTS0U7IOyRqM78oxJeKJVEKFPPCwZapHsyWNFWt1TN1;
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (sj-natpool-220.cisco.com [128.107.248.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by fasolt.mtcc.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k74Kv76e003696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:57:09 -0700
Message-ID: <44D3B49D.9090800@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:57:01 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Thunderbird/0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Damon <deepvoice@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
References: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com> <44D24A20.6050109@mtcc.com> <20060803153457.X33570@simone.iecc.com> <44D36203.2060803@mtcc.com> <20060804112731.I21459@simone.iecc.com> <44D36B4A.2050903@mtcc.com> <20060804114527.Y27352@simone.iecc.com> <44D37376.4020408@mtcc.com> <20060804132203.Y49810@simone.iecc.com> <EAF17954-74A3-4374-A059-B31A1414B350@mail-abuse.org> <62146370608041122t779d200h1b29a659ac8ad612@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <62146370608041122t779d200h1b29a659ac8ad612@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Authentication-Results: fasolt.mtcc.com; header.From=mike@mtcc.com; dkim=pass ( sig from mtcc.com/dicks.drop.kirkwood verified; ); header.From=mike@mtcc.com; dkim=pass ( sig from mtcc.com/dicks.drop.kirkwood verified; );
X-XIPE-SCORES: dispose=pass; ACD=1.00; CLAM=0.00; COMPLY=0.00; URL=0.00; SA=0.00; HONEY=0.00;
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f

Damon wrote:

>> "SIGN ALL MAIL"
>>
>
> We _dont_ really really mean it.

You and others seem to be having a big problem differentiating between
signing and verifying. I can make a perfectly valid statement that I
sign all of my mail. There is no guarantee that it will survive intact.
Period. Once it's left my domain, I have no control of what intermediaries
do. This is a fact of life, and no amount of glib dismissals or fanciful
reinterpretations of that true statement says alters that.

       Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html