IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements

"Hector Santos" <hsantos@santronics.com> Sun, 06 August 2006 11:44 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9h3F-0005cy-3t for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 07:44:13 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9h3D-0005xT-Mc for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 07:44:13 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k76BhI5W004117; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:43:19 -0700
Received: from winserver.com (catinthebox.net [208.247.131.9]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k76Bh9kF004099 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:43:10 -0700
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.1.451.8) for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 07:45:20 -0400
Received: from hdev1 ([72.144.82.177]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.1.451.8) with ESMTP id 1618504047; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 07:45:19 -0400
Message-ID: <033701c6b94d$4b51a4e0$0201a8c0@hdev1>
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@santronics.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20060805034058.861.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <44D4FB5A.5020704@mtcc.com> <00e801c6b8cf$b4d7f230$0201a8c0@hdev1> <44D5CC6A.1080408@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 07:41:41 -0400
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69

What is out of line is one who is suppose be writing the design requirement
has suddenly decided that it probably isn't a good idea after all.

What's wrong with that picture?  Ban me if you must, I will not lower my
standards, my ethics nor morals.  Never.

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com


----- Original Message -----

From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos@santronics.com>
Cc: <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements


>
> Hector,
>
> I missed this one earlier.
>
> Hector Santos wrote:
> > My apology to the WG chairs, but this is utterly ridiculous position
coming
> > from a person who is suppose to write the SSP design requirements.  It
reeks
> > badly with obvious signs of conflict of interest by specific individuals
to
> > kill SSP.
>
> This is also out of line. You're accusing someone of bad faith (which
> is totally out-of-line) and without even waiting to see the I-D (which
> is ridiculously premature).
>
> Stephen.
>


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email