Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

[Mark Delany <[e-mail]>]

On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:41:39AM -0000, John Levine allegedly wrote:
> >> So if I set a policy of "I sign all", and a mailing list mangles
> >> it, what exactly is the mailing list receiving the bounce going to
> >> do? Blackhole it? Bounce the user off the list? Anything useful
> >> whatsoever?
> 
> >That's a matter between the "I sign all" and the list. I would say
> >that if it hurts, don't do it.
> 
> No, the sensible user will accept all the mail from the list.  With

Well maybe, but that's not the intent of my style of "I sign all".

If "I sign all" I would much rather no one accept a mail purportedly
from me that doesn't verify. Why would an "I sign all" domain want
mail accepted that can't be proved to be from them?

But them I'm missing this whole "list" issue. It seems to me to be
largely a red-herring because the size of the intersection of "I sign
all" traffic and DKIM-unaware Lists is pure speculation at this stage.


Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html