IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 08 August 2006 01:05 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAG1v-00044p-8l for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:05:11 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAG1t-0001z8-Tl for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:05:11 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7814KXh015636; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:04:21 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-67-127-185-56.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.185.56]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k78144vn015616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:04:04 -0700
Message-ID: <44D7E2E6.2070202@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:03:34 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Macdonald <jmacdonald@e-dialog.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy
References: <20060805163953.Q47527@simone.iecc.com> <015701c6b8e3$9f7d8c10$0201a8c0@hdev1> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0608051701210.11690@sokol.elan.net> <20060805204554.R185@simone.iecc.com> <20060807233656.GE7863@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20060807233656.GE7863@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007


Jeff Macdonald wrote:
>> senders are not the right people to judge their own importance.
> 
> So, I've been thinking pretty much the same thing after seeing all the
> recent threads going on. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that
> DKIM and related tech are the wrong approach.


Feel free to start a separate effort to develop the 'right' approach.

It strikes me as unlikely that pursuing the question in this venue, at this
stage of effort, is likely to be productive for either approach.

d/
-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email