Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 04 August 2006 16:26 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G92Vf-0005OJ-5i for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:26:51 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G92Oe-00012m-MF for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:19:39 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74GGV59011326; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:16:31 -0700
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie (imx2.tcd.ie [134.226.1.156]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74GGHYK011307 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:16:17 -0700
Received: from Vams.imx2 (imx2.tcd.ie [134.226.1.156]) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C5926802B; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:15:49 +0100 (IST)
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie ([134.226.1.156]) by imx2.tcd.ie ([134.226.1.156]) with SMTP (gateway) id A023FE292EA; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:15:49 +0100
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [134.226.144.16]) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF686825C; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:15:49 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <44D372D4.3040305@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:16:20 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John L <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
References: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com> <44D0E259.7040400@mtcc.com> <20060802165510.X1168@simone.iecc.com> <44D160BD.7080209@mtcc.com> <20060802223619.E86316@simone.iecc.com> <44D24A20.6050109@mtcc.com> <20060803153457.X33570@simone.iecc.com> <44D36203.2060803@mtcc.com> <20060804112731.I21459@simone.iecc.com> <44D36B4A.2050903@mtcc.com> <20060804114527.Y27352@simone.iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060804114527.Y27352@simone.iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus-Status: MessageID = A123FE292EA
X-AntiVirus-Status: Host: imx2.tcd.ie
X-AntiVirus-Status: Action Taken:
X-AntiVirus-Status: NONE
X-AntiVirus-Status: Checked by TCD Vexira. (version=1.56.3 VDF=8.1276)
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f


John L wrote:
>  I REALLY do not want an SSP that says "I sign
> everything, and here is my estimate on a 0 to 10 scale of how much you 
> should care."

Is that because you can't trust the value, or because it opens up an
avenue for a spammer who'll get through if he keeps trying, or
because of something else? (Just wondering.)

Ta,
S.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html