IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 04 August 2006 23:07 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G98kz-0001xU-Vr for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:07:05 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G98ky-0004WK-JH for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:07:05 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74Mhe7N001425; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:43:40 -0700
Received: from fasolt.mtcc.com (adsl-216-102-208-10.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.208.10]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74MhPVo001401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:43:26 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=0.4; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=763; t=1154731371; x=115 5595371; c=relaxed/simple; s=dicks.drop.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subje ct:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=F rom:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com>|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20 A=20more=20fundamental=20SSP=20axiom|Sender:=20|To:=20Damon=20<deepvoice@gm ail.com>|Cc:=20John=20L=20<johnl@iecc.com>, =20=20ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org|Con tent-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Type:=20text/pla in=3B=20charset=3DUTF-8=3B=20format=3Dflowed; bh=Nf+mXW/xibqqu79UIjI+bs4Hev YKGqP44z1iNb7ZWdM=; b=DG1XXLU+cn0Yslm/EeAsGr3AQit34D24jds3D4JZOd7O+2Rqzyshj/TYf63D3hDjUGiRG3Zy aBhonpvZnI63+R6tHKDnvUWeivtFOx8zFqzZa9GE/+jJkFhuqvq5DY/Y;
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=763; t=1154731371; x=1155595371; c=re laxed/simple; s=dicks.drop.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Tr ansfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:Michael=2 0Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com>|Subject:Re=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20A=20more=20fundamen tal=20SSP=20axiom|Sender:|To:Damon=20<deepvoice@gmail.com>|Cc:John=20L=20<j ohnl@iecc.com>, =20=20ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org|Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit| MIME-Version:1.0|Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DUTF-8=3B=20format=3 Dflowed; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3D9J+1R8q3OVg0TDo2cZEg7LPE+qc=3D; b=LSollDX3Cfev7y+VrVPSGjsqnTsJyfiioLwuvs6FOGCkRg3EPUNTp5fyONcCb6nTKTFZil8p PvTJrTa/cXQrAy1K2rBxbDns1sx0y8ravTOZGAlit/Z37TUl42+gHmEk;
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (sj-natpool-220.cisco.com [128.107.248.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by fasolt.mtcc.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k74MgnvY011124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:42:51 -0700
Message-ID: <44D3CD64.4080807@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 15:42:44 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Thunderbird/0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Damon <deepvoice@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
References: <20060804173538.54245.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <44D3C0BB.9000405@mtcc.com> <20060804174955.N15734@simone.iecc.com> <44D3C8DB.4070101@mtcc.com> <62146370608041539n630b336alc599bb9bdd991152@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <62146370608041539n630b336alc599bb9bdd991152@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Authentication-Results: fasolt.mtcc.com; header.From=mike@mtcc.com; dkim=pass ( sig from mtcc.com/dicks.drop.kirkwood verified; ); header.From=mike@mtcc.com; dkim=pass ( sig from mtcc.com/dicks.drop.kirkwood verified; );
X-XIPE-SCORES: dispose=pass; ACD=1.00; CLAM=0.00; COMPLY=0.00; URL=0.00; SA=0.00; HONEY=0.00;
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3

Damon wrote:

>> > I wasn't aware that "receiver" was a synonym for "commercial spam
>> > filter vendor."  One learns something new every day.
>>
>> Meaning that your opinion of utility is not the sole gauge of 
>> utility. In
>> fact, you probably benefit a lot from people who find utility in 
>> things that
>> you don't care about to keep your mail mostly spam free.
>>
>>
>
> Really banging my head on this one... the only way I see this working
> 100% every time is an RFC change to the MTA protocol where DKIM
> becomes part of the handshake.
>
> I see the MTAs willing to take the risk of adding "I SIGN ALL" as the
> ones that would be harmed the most with its failure.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand this at all.

       Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email