IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Wed, 02 August 2006 17:37 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8Kev-0000Ho-NO for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:37:29 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8Keu-0008Ai-BV for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:37:29 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k72Ha9B7005819; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:36:09 -0700
Received: from fasolt.mtcc.com (adsl-216-102-208-10.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.102.208.10]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k72Ha2Al005802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:36:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=0.3; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=610; t=1154540127; x=1155404127; c=relaxed/simple; s=dicks.drop.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20A=20more=20fundamental=20SSP=20axiom |Sender:=20 |To:=20John=20L=20<johnl@iecc.com> |Cc:=20DKIM=20List=20<ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org> |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20format=3Dflowe d; bh=7mLuOe4tf7FE40ulqXT6/AafwAvpQmEMAQh4E/qA1nc=; b=Ot2WDVS83B0reF1sTgBZCZ5gORGiaYCyvxJCV0/em4O4kuaWhpa8K4DoFdsblX53WN5Fs05E hmaLyCObAWNUlNDyf+XjacfW6mbXJ2EkIoiz1GzzfO3dcUq9BO65NnSn;
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=610; t=1154540127; x=1155404127; c=relaxed/simple; s=dicks.drop.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20A=20more=20fundamental=20SSP=20axiom |Sender: |To:John=20L=20<johnl@iecc.com> |Cc:DKIM=20List=20<ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org> |Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit |MIME-Version:1.0 |Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20format=3Dflowe d; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DTHgzsy76Cqx29/einu/PnNiEwmM=3D; b=MQP95BgKgsu/+tPZmBQBHYnRHG9jUM1jIRS1A3UVC6VNtdmF3UMguvMWt99aLkRZfiB4ZUy/ 38p/JEV2lfbYYBjfEXAW+VITAHV92Bko/qxo6Y1GRjFNofmF0qo/ApPA;
Received: from [171.71.97.63] (dhcp-171-71-97-63.cisco.com [171.71.97.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by fasolt.mtcc.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k72HZQct010112 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:35:27 -0700
Message-ID: <44D0E259.7040400@mtcc.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:35:21 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Thunderbird/0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John L <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
References: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Authentication-Results: fasolt.mtcc.com; header.From=mike@mtcc.com; dkim=pass ( sig from mtcc.com/dicks.drop.kirkwood verified; ); header.From=mike@mtcc.com; dkim=pass ( sig from mtcc.com/dicks.drop.kirkwood verified; );
X-XIPE-SCORES: dispose=pass; ACD=1.00; CLAM=0.00; COMPLY=0.00; URL=0.00; SA=0.00; HONEY=0.00;
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32

John L wrote:

> How about this one:
>
>   SSP exists so that receivers can make better decisions about
>   handling their incoming mail.
>
> Corollary:
>
>   Information not useful to receivers doesn't belong in SSP.
>
> These seem obvious to me, but based on some other correspondence, 
> they're not obvious to everyone.


I think a more fundamental question is who the consumers of SSP information
are.  I think that everybody agrees that DKIM receivers are an important
constituent, but are they the only ones? It doesn't seem very hard to 
envision
other consumers.

          Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email