Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements

[John L <[e-mail]>]

> That's a pretty reasonable question, frankly. The set of domains that 
> would actually benefit from SSP from the consensus I've seen seems like 
> it's a pretty tiny fraction of the internet at large and almost 
> certainly could be handled by third party dnsbl-like or accreditation 
> schemes as well.

Agreed.  That's what I've been thinking all along.

> But it may be worth it if for no other reason to provide the transport, 
> discovery, and syntax framework for putting goodies in for the 
> experiment.

If people want to do experiements, they should do experiments.  The IESG 
would never go for an SSP spec that was just a container for data yet to 
be invented.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html