RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
Arvel Hathcock <arvel.hathcock@altn.com> Wed, 02 August 2006 19:26 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8MLz-00015A-V6 for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:26:03 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8MLy-0006sa-JF for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:26:03 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k72JP6I4025076; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:25:06 -0700
Received: from c3po.altn.com (c3po.altn.com [65.240.66.134]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k72JOvTt025003 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:24:57 -0700
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=altn.com; s=c3po; l=818; x=1155129830; q=dns; h=DomainKey-Signature:Received:Date:From: Subject:To:Organization:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:Message-ID; z=DomainKey-Signa ture:=20a=3Drsa-sha1=3B=20s=3Dc3po=3B=20d=3Daltn.com=3B=0D=0A=09 c=3Dnofws=3B=20q=3Ddns=3B=20h=3Dfrom=3Amessage-id=3B=0D=0A=09b=3 DPezGnAlHnQnANPWoty5DrYJ5ovvADtcl0QY+9fxO9NpJc/mP/z1q2b+aqvXg=0D =0A=09/4sFpkfzyngdMbM2flxyTSmEm35jAqJ37YKIt5M9xAEIZD80XHFhGJWOT= 0D=0A=09AvFClWPJ3WFUSNCBbVApOI2olaHannbCDN0Hb8gblN/3R2ZMVkQQyg=3 D=3B|Received:=20from=20ARVEL.altn.int=20by=20altn.com=0D=0A=09( Cipher=20TLSv1=3ARC4-MD5=3A128)=20(MDaemon=20PRO=20v9.0.6)=0D=0A =09with=20ESMTP=20id=20md50001708986.msg=0D=0A=09for=20<ietf-dki m@mipassoc.org>=3B=20Wed,=2002=20Aug=202006=2014=3A23=3A49=20-05 00|Date:=20Wed,=2002=20Aug=202006=2014=3A23=3A00=20-0500|From:=2 0Arvel=20Hathcock=20<arvel.hathcock@altn.com>|Subject:=20RE=3A=2 0[ietf-dkim]=20A=20more=20fundamental=20SSP=20axiom|To:=20"'ietf -dkim@mipassoc.org'"=20<ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>|Organization:=20 Alt-N=20Technologies|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Type:=20text/pl ain=3B=20charset=3Dus-ascii|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Reply-To:=20arvel.hathcock@altn.com|Message-ID:=20<MDA EMON-F200608021423.AA2348198md50000010107@altn.com>; b=mcIUWxFb2 Goax1+NzBwtbYrqkJjXebwax/zbe7wqH8hZr+cLyVf1j8zs4vh1QBp1tXmIk3KhH mMKP1wB1rDcXQ7Z/EhgtLGhHFjW6/TzAS5lrAlH4AhS8932h3rInn8E9uC8YbV8H DD0zOh2ajGdcWRNIbj0tfjZucjxuCA/4fs=
DKIM-Signature: v=0.4; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=altn.com; s=c3po; l=818; x=1155129830; q=dns; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Organization:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:Message-ID; z=Do mainKey-Signature:=20a=3Drsa-sha1=3B=20s=3Dc3po=3B=20d=3Daltn.co m=3B=0D=0A=09c=3Dnofws=3B=20q=3Ddns=3B=20h=3Dfrom=3Amessage-id=3 B=0D=0A=09b=3DPezGnAlHnQnANPWoty5DrYJ5ovvADtcl0QY+9fxO9NpJc/mP/z 1q2b+aqvXg=0D=0A=09/4sFpkfzyngdMbM2flxyTSmEm35jAqJ37YKIt5M9xAEIZ D80XHFhGJWOT=0D=0A=09AvFClWPJ3WFUSNCBbVApOI2olaHannbCDN0Hb8gblN/ 3R2ZMVkQQyg=3D=3B|Received:=20from=20ARVEL.altn.int=20by=20altn. com=0D=0A=09(Cipher=20TLSv1=3ARC4-MD5=3A128)=20(MDaemon=20PRO=20 v9.0.6)=0D=0A=09with=20ESMTP=20id=20md50001708986.msg=0D=0A=09fo r=20<ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>=3B=20Wed,=2002=20Aug=202006=2014=3A 23=3A49=20-0500|Date:=20Wed,=2002=20Aug=202006=2014=3A23=3A00=20 -0500|From:=20Arvel=20Hathcock=20<arvel.hathcock@altn.com>|Subje ct:=20RE=3A=20[ietf-dkim]=20A=20more=20fundamental=20SSP=20axiom |To:=20"'ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org'"=20<ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>|Org anization:=20Alt-N=20Technologies|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Ty pe:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3Dus-ascii|Content-Transfer-Encodi ng:=20quoted-printable|Reply-To:=20arvel.hathcock@altn.com|Messa ge-ID:=20<MDAEMON-F200608021423.AA2348198md50000010107@altn.com>; bh=WTDQh6abWkey2AOtdqSoN5YnUC2wg0BvX2fhqmj3mnA=; b=L2pmLSxT4Y5eZ 0QppJqj5oITJ4CzAabSrGXee1gPy676qJkxK63Bb/GpZ1yb0rxJcY6atQgsQCPRc pdsrhMi7OEeYjBu627OjmISrja4+25B5xB9oYD1fv1gxk1q0FC6xEK9tRcj992fx mJw848kV01Iq7yhn6ykM/pR/jT3xbk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=c3po; d=altn.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=PezGnAlHnQnANPWoty5DrYJ5ovvADtcl0QY+9fxO9NpJc/mP/z1q2b+aqvXg /4sFpkfzyngdMbM2flxyTSmEm35jAqJ37YKIt5M9xAEIZD80XHFhGJWOT AvFClWPJ3WFUSNCBbVApOI2olaHannbCDN0Hb8gblN/3R2ZMVkQQyg=;
Received: from ARVEL.altn.int by altn.com (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (MDaemon PRO v9.0.6) with ESMTP id md50001708986.msg for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:23:49 -0500
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:23:00 -0500
From: Arvel Hathcock <arvel.hathcock@altn.com>
Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom
To: "'ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org'" <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-Priority: 3
Organization: Alt-N Technologies
X-Mailer: Outlook Connector for MDaemon 2.1.2d
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Authenticated-Sender: arvel.hathcock@altn.com
X-HashCash: 1:21:060802:md50001708986::hbinfwgnBacMDAFR:00001bvE
X-Spam-Processed: c3po.altn.com, Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:23:49 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-Return-Path: arvel.hathcock@altn.com
X-Envelope-From: arvel.hathcock@altn.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Message-ID: <MDAEMON-F200608021423.AA2348198md50000010107@altn.com>
X-MDAV-Processed: c3po.altn.com, Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:23:50 -0500
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sb7.songbird.com id k72JOvTt025003
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: arvel.hathcock@altn.com
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
> As soon as we have a basis for believing that Receive side folk with actually > USE information provided by senders, then the senders are much more likely to > provide it. After all, providing it improves deliverability. Ah, I see. Thanks for helping me understand better. > If we only focus on sender-side desires, then we will specify a jillion clever > mechanisms that will not get used, rather than the few that will. So, focus narrowly on what receivers would find of immediate benefit for an initial round of SSP work which will entice senders to provide it. I hadn't looked at it quite that way before. This approach does have several advantages -- not the least of which is the potential to actually complete something useful in our life-times. -- Arvel _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Paul Hoffman
- [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom wayne
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Paul Hoffman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment Bill.Oxley
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment John L
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom wayne
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Damon
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Mark Delany
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom John Levine
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Bill.Oxley
- [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Mark Delany
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Mark Delany
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements John L
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardiz… Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Michael Thomas
- [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy John L
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM Client Policy Requirement Douglas Otis
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Bill.Oxley
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy John L
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Mark Delany
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardiz… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardiz… Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Arvel Hathcock
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Damon
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Jeff Macdonald
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy Jeff Macdonald
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom Graham Murray