IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment

John L <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 04 August 2006 18:06 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9444-0004mk-P0 for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:06:28 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G9443-0008TR-D8 for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:06:28 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74I5nYe028029; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:05:50 -0700
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k74I5bUv027977 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:05:38 -0700
Received: (qmail 21738 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2006 18:05:11 -0000
Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Aug 2006 18:05:11 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Aug 2006 18:05:11 -0000
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:05:11 -0400
From: John L <johnl@iecc.com>
To: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <EAF17954-74A3-4374-A059-B31A1414B350@mail-abuse.org>
Message-ID: <20060804140319.G49810@simone.iecc.com>
References: <20060802002353.U59653@simone.iecc.com> <44D0E259.7040400@mtcc.com> <20060802165510.X1168@simone.iecc.com> <44D160BD.7080209@mtcc.com> <20060802223619.E86316@simone.iecc.com> <44D24A20.6050109@mtcc.com> <20060803153457.X33570@simone.iecc.com> <44D36203.2060803@mtcc.com> <20060804112731.I21459@simone.iecc.com> <44D36B4A.2050903@mtcc.com> <20060804114527.Y27352@simone.iecc.com> <44D37376.4020408@mtcc.com> <20060804132203.Y49810@simone.iecc.com> <EAF17954-74A3-4374-A059-B31A1414B350@mail-abuse.org>
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Subject: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25

a) "SIGN ALL MAIL" and "DO NOT USE ANY SERVICES KNOWN TO DAMAGE THEIR SIGNATURES"

b) "SIGN ALL MAIL"

I want to put "ALL MAIL HAS TOM SWIFTIES" in my SSP.

Assuming you agree that's ridiculous, what's the practical difference to 
people using SSP between that and b) above?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email