IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hotel situation

Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Tue, 05 January 2016 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E7E1A87CD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:32:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AND0y31o7nw8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [64.71.170.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C3571A87CE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 07:32:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucidvision.com; s=default; t=1452007950; bh=/DbjrFFXXpeM8htRTNEHZ1lDw3OOgpHLYjwjoFRsyDM=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=fQ84TpSnTnlov/4hWWrFCgn1kctK9oGEhDEz5sk4BcsNLwK8yuB/9qWdVTTgRHTeK hFUCw4b6wPuORIdWJuk+aU+NLxYgX4XzpE+Grb1VweZ+rpT8hOXJyKUZyDaHhZDEuf q4AbzQ7cwVbMC4v0aGh9t7jMZIrRQyPBhKKiUpgM=
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.255.148.181;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <568B89BD.1040008@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:32:30 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1EF87B28-3CB1-4672-8433-39F3771D04EE@lucidvision.com>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF6449900E0@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <CABmDk8n2TFvmoMVa8t3FOGXtKF9GUii=wrEyMpJucAoLzCix1Q@mail.gmail.com> <D38CB535C27A8E9D7B77BC2F@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <568B89BD.1040008@gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
X-Authenticated-User: tnadeau@lucidvision.com
X-Info: aspam skipped due to (g_smite_skip_relay)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow Age=0 Spam=0 Notspam=3 Stars=0 Good=0 Friend=0 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=50.255.148.181
X-IP-stats: Notspam Incoming Last 0, First 235, in=2971, out=0, spam=0 Known=true ip=50.255.148.181
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8BXuMDbTsa3tIQuAboyB6gR6qH4>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 15:32:36 -0000

	I very much agree.

	—Tom


> On Jan 5, 2016:4:15 AM, at 4:15 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/01/2016 21:33, John C Klensin wrote:
>> (1) While it is clear that people who favor going back to
>> Minneapolis are in the minority of the Meetings Committee (at
>> least as they and the IAOC count votes), it is much less clear
>> that such people are in the minority of active participants in
>> the IETF.
> Minneapolis is really a metaphor for functional, works well for most
> people, easy to get flights and hotels, flight times not too bad, not regarded
> as a holiday trip at work, everyone is there to work.
> 
> It does not have to be Minneapolis, but the utilitarian properties above,
> are in my view far more relevant than the IETF World Tour model we
> seem to have in place.
> 
> - Stewart
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email