Re: Hotel situation

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 17 December 2015 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4821A92BB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:54:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nqk4Ns4HUXJB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F36D1A92B4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 85303 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2015 01:54:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 17 Dec 2015 01:54:23 -0000
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:54:01 -0000
Message-ID: <20151217015401.15246.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|badf29b738c652c920b448e6edd3535crBFNEu03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|3DEC78C4-FF79-4FD2-BFE8-D0DC3295D93A@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Zb7_rJ2_tfGruS6dMAv7WCc9gas>
Cc: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:54:25 -0000

>But have we had over 1,000 rooms in one venue in recent memory? 

Not that I recall, but there's generally been reasonable alternatives
within a few blocks.  The B.A. Hilton is in a dramatic location, but
it's a long way from anything else.

>Looking at IETF 96 in Berlin, the InterContinental Berlin only has 558 rooms and suites, and the Conrad
>Seoul for IETF 97 has 434 rooms.

The last time we were in Berlin I stayed at the reasonably priced
Hotel Lützow which was about three blocks from the IC, and there were
plenty of other hotels in the immediate area.

R's,
John

PS: I am not faulting the IAOC for any of this.  Once we made the
commitment to go to Argentina, the options are pretty limited.  There
are for example lots of hotels close to each other in Mar del Plata
where ICANN met a decade ago, but I suspect the six hour bus trip
across the pampas from the B.A. airport might provoke a few complaints.