RE: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Sun, 10 January 2016 22:03 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3C21A0397 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:03:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uPp6xJBoUqGV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B5C1A038F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:03:13 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f797e6d000007600-61-5692d51f27d1
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.87]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F3.31.30208.F15D2965; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:03:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.76]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:03:10 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation
Thread-Topic: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation
Thread-Index: AQHROB/qaQqJBcxF+kWlF3iYU6o3Dp7OJ9gAgB19S1CAABMWgIAANgAAgADED4CAAEaYgIAADbOAgAAFBwCAABz8gIAFO3yAgAFSmoCAAJjxgIAAv5sAgAAOeQCAABhBAIAAPzEB
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37D1124D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1601100939050.27780@rabdullah.local>, <20160110191700.42703.qmail@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20160110191700.42703.qmail@ary.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37D1124DESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmplkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbE9XFf+6qQwgyeHRSyebZzPYnG6Zw2T A5PHkiU/mTzubQkNYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyri0ezdLwR6VipVnprE0MF6W62Lk5JAQMJHo uHOXGcIWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAYUaJ+3tnM0M4ixkles92A2U4ONgELCS6/2mDNIgIOEk8mnyH HcQWFjCWWLlxHSNE3ESiv6GPCcKexihxc2Y1iM0ioCqxZnMHWD2vgK9Ey7VZYPVCAmkSzzvn gtmcAoYSDfvugtmMQAd9P7UGbA6zgLhE05eVrBCHCkgs2XMe6mhRiZeP/7GCnMYskC9x/Iww xHhBiZMzn7BMYBSehaR7FkLVLCRVECUGEl/e34aytSWWLXzNDGHrS3S/P82ELL6AkX0Vo2hx anFSbrqRsV5qUWZycXF+nl5easkmRmDkHNzyW3UH4+U3jocYBTgYlXh4DU5ODBNiTSwrrsw9 xCjBwawkwqsfNilMiDclsbIqtSg/vqg0J7X4EKM0B4uSOG+STGOYkEB6YklqdmpqQWoRTJaJ g1OqgTE/bkp4X9eLvV/3ztFNu7PYzNt/8wHDjaJf73ubVqrMuL1mzuyAEL6ptzifnbv1/ROX +/E9Tvt4LLas1lMN4TEsOVi37X/Q/ePzvlxVecU86yffojuBF5d/51z3NFJnYdfKufLr5wuI 5qxNupNzXfhSnfnrBmmRRROjeefOEzll4fBd506Yv36TEktxRqKhFnNRcSIA+PN1kZgCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/r7SnjJepYokGlEAOrZ440iEbx5I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:03:15 -0000
Hi, If we can get a good deal in Vegas (or wherever else) I don't see why we should drop it just because there is a risk that we are afterwards asked not to come back... Regards, Christer Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: John Levine<mailto:johnl@taugh.com> Sent: 10/01/2016 21:17 To: ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org> Subject: Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation >gamble," but I do agree with John: I very much doubt we would actually >impact the cash flow of the casino, it's not like they would close it >to outsiders ;-) True, and by Vegas standards, the IETF is a pretty small meeting. The recent CES had 170,000 attendees and 3800 booths. I have no love for Las Vegas, but on a quick peek at the city's meeting planner site I asked for hotels with at least 1000 rooms, 40K sq ft of meeting space, and a meeting room that can hold 1500, and it immediately found 19 different hotels that could do that. On the other hand, some hotels really do tell meetings to go away if the people are low spenders. My father used to run a company that gave short technical courses, several running at once each with 20 to 50 people for 3-5 days. They'd been using the same hotel for years until one day the hotel told them we love you, but your people don't drink enough so you'll have to find another place. R's, John
- Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- RE: Hotel situation Ted Lemon
- Re: Hotel situation Jared Mauch
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Wicinski
- RE: Hotel situation Ted Lemon
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation Dave Crocker
- Re: Hotel situation Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Hotel situation Eggert, Lars
- Re: Hotel situation Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Hotel situation Nadeau Thomas
- Re: Hotel situation Paul Wouters
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Paul Wouters
- Re: Hotel situation Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: Hotel situation Lou Berger
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Hotel situation Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation John R Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Toerless Eckert
- Re: Hotel situation Sarah Banks
- Re: Hotel situation Donald Eastlake
- Re: Hotel situation Livingood, Jason
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Livingood, Jason
- Re: Hotel situation Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Hotel situation Sarah Banks
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Chown
- Re: Hotel situation Ray Pelletier
- Re: Hotel situation Brian Rosen
- Re: Hotel situation Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: Hotel situation Christian Hopps
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Fernando Gont
- Re: Hotel situation Fernando Gont
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Chown
- Re: Hotel situation Jari Arkko
- Re: Hotel situation Toerless Eckert
- Re: Hotel situation Jari Arkko
- Re: Hotel situation Jared Mauch
- Re: Hotel situation Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Hotel situation Warren Kumari
- Re: Hotel situation Eggert, Lars
- Re: Hotel situation Leif Johansson
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Chown
- Re: Hotel situation Brian Rosen
- Re: Hotel situation Toerless Eckert
- Re: Hotel situation Stewart Bryant
- Re: Hotel situation Warren Kumari
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation Warren Kumari
- Re: Hotel situation Michal Krsek
- Re: Hotel situation Warren Kumari
- Re: Hotel situation Dave Crocker
- Venue Selection Objectives and Criteria was Re: H… Ray Pelletier
- Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Carsten Bormann
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Michal Krsek
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Andrew Sullivan
- Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Wassim Haddad
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Richard Shockey
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) tom p.
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Jari Arkko
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) John Levine
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Stephen Farrell
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Jari Arkko
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) John C Klensin
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- RE: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Ralph Droms
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) John C Klensin
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) John C Klensin
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Jari Arkko
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Jari Arkko
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Eric Burger
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) tom p.
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Hotel situation Pat (Patricia) Thaler
- RE: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Ted Lemon
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Eric Burger
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Joel M. Halpern
- InterContinental BA experience so far (was: Re: H… Marco Davids
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Keith Moore
- Re: InterContinental BA experience so far (was: R… John Levine
- Re: InterContinental BA experience so far (was: R… Melinda Shore
- Re: InterContinental BA experience so far (was: R… John Levine
- Re: InterContinental BA experience so far (was: R… Fernando Gont
- RE: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Ted Lemon
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Ted Lemon
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Keith Moore
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Payouts for missed blocks (was Re: Hotel situatio… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Payouts for missed blocks (was Re: Hotel situ… John C Klensin
- Re: Payouts for missed blocks (was Re: Hotel situ… Theodore Ts'o
- Independent Stream (was Re: Cross-area review (wa… Dave Crocker
- RE: Hotel situation Eric Gray
- Re: Hotel situation Mary Barnes
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Jari Arkko
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel situation Stewart Bryant
- Re: Hotel situation Jari Arkko
- Re: Hotel situation l.wood
- Re: Hotel situation Christian Hopps
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel situation Dave Crocker
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Chown
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Venue Selection Objectives and Criteria was R… George, Wes
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel situation Nadeau Thomas
- Re: Hotel situation Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Hotel situation Jared Mauch
- Venue Data for Upcoming Meetings was Re: Hotel si… Ray Pelletier
- Re: Hotel situation tom p.
- Re: Hotel situation Bob Hinden
- Re: Hotel situation Randy Bush
- Re: Hotel situation Paul Wouters
- Re: Hotel situation Richard Shockey
- Re: Hotel situation Randy Bush
- Re: Hotel situation Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Hotel situation lloyd.wood
- Re: locations, was Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: locations, was Hotel situation lloyd.wood
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- "resource-rich urban environments" (was "Re: Hote… Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: not really the current Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Lloyd Wood
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel situation Toerless Eckert
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel situation Ole Jacobsen
- Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation John Levine
- RE: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation Christer Holmberg
- Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation Theodore V Faber
- Re: Venue Data for Upcoming Meetings was Re: Hote… Ray Pelletier