RE: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Sun, 10 January 2016 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3C21A0397 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:03:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uPp6xJBoUqGV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B5C1A038F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:03:13 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f797e6d000007600-61-5692d51f27d1
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.87]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F3.31.30208.F15D2965; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:03:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.76]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:03:10 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation
Thread-Topic: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation
Thread-Index: AQHROB/qaQqJBcxF+kWlF3iYU6o3Dp7OJ9gAgB19S1CAABMWgIAANgAAgADED4CAAEaYgIAADbOAgAAFBwCAABz8gIAFO3yAgAFSmoCAAJjxgIAAv5sAgAAOeQCAABhBAIAAPzEB
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37D1124D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1601100939050.27780@rabdullah.local>, <20160110191700.42703.qmail@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20160110191700.42703.qmail@ary.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37D1124DESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmplkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbE9XFf+6qQwgyeHRSyebZzPYnG6Zw2T A5PHkiU/mTzubQkNYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyri0ezdLwR6VipVnprE0MF6W62Lk5JAQMJHo uHOXGcIWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAYUaJ+3tnM0M4ixkles92A2U4ONgELCS6/2mDNIgIOEk8mnyH HcQWFjCWWLlxHSNE3ESiv6GPCcKexihxc2Y1iM0ioCqxZnMHWD2vgK9Ey7VZYPVCAmkSzzvn gtmcAoYSDfvugtmMQAd9P7UGbA6zgLhE05eVrBCHCkgs2XMe6mhRiZeP/7GCnMYskC9x/Iww xHhBiZMzn7BMYBSehaR7FkLVLCRVECUGEl/e34aytSWWLXzNDGHrS3S/P82ELL6AkX0Vo2hx anFSbrqRsV5qUWZycXF+nl5easkmRmDkHNzyW3UH4+U3jocYBTgYlXh4DU5ODBNiTSwrrsw9 xCjBwawkwqsfNilMiDclsbIqtSg/vqg0J7X4EKM0B4uSOG+STGOYkEB6YklqdmpqQWoRTJaJ g1OqgTE/bkp4X9eLvV/3ztFNu7PYzNt/8wHDjaJf73ubVqrMuL1mzuyAEL6ptzifnbv1/ROX +/E9Tvt4LLas1lMN4TEsOVi37X/Q/ePzvlxVecU86yffojuBF5d/51z3NFJnYdfKufLr5wuI 5qxNupNzXfhSnfnrBmmRRROjeefOEzll4fBd506Yv36TEktxRqKhFnNRcSIA+PN1kZgCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/r7SnjJepYokGlEAOrZ440iEbx5I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:03:15 -0000

Hi,

If we can get a good deal in Vegas (or wherever else) I don't see why we should drop it just because there is a risk that we are afterwards asked not to come back...

Regards,

Christer

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: John Levine<mailto:johnl@taugh.com>
Sent: ‎10/‎01/‎2016 21:17
To: ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation

>gamble," but I do agree with John: I very much doubt we would actually
>impact the cash flow of the casino, it's not like they would close it
>to outsiders ;-)

True, and by Vegas standards, the IETF is a pretty small meeting.  The
recent CES had 170,000 attendees and 3800 booths.  I have no love for
Las Vegas, but on a quick peek at the city's meeting planner site I
asked for hotels with at least 1000 rooms, 40K sq ft of meeting space,
and a meeting room that can hold 1500, and it immediately found 19
different hotels that could do that.

On the other hand, some hotels really do tell meetings to go away if
the people are low spenders.  My father used to run a company that
gave short technical courses, several running at once each with 20 to
50 people for 3-5 days.  They'd been using the same hotel for years
until one day the hotel told them we love you, but your people don't
drink enough so you'll have to find another place.

R's,
John