Re: Hotel situation

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 18 December 2015 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A31A1B3796 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:42:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlyqfgzZJdy0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:42:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x232.google.com (mail-yk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC1A1B3792 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:42:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p130so66118721yka.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:42:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KJVqIRSV+ADY88qoKZ9vVRkn7+lgm9nu9qhflgAnxnI=; b=jSPZBwwaqM1j1mcQ7YHit85uMZ++JMzZ56T7hpzkLZAXtlt6tjRxrvIWbFeLSTBXq/ JSWtFcPofjHodF9VjugOc5K1uso0sLcIBrMnJI9zrQItBWH8omZa3iVovUZzrdR9g9yI OLdt37MjWmQpELBkiWHtxDOZ6YIcyJleOL+xy3sSb0VuqikvKTBFQryJfQ7xlS/EKcet PlBknwXpIBzx4t4wLW1RWrRvxqVfCUChed+wPZf5C66XF2CxrkV37Nd4Pp1gapknkqW9 DfiEMAAJh9j7cLFthsuroOV2P1+KAxjWJbHGEVmwQpTcEGB1SV5CVTdUopjhM+lcGCIW 3q5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KJVqIRSV+ADY88qoKZ9vVRkn7+lgm9nu9qhflgAnxnI=; b=U0yWOGUntCAc6kMOTD4/M95Q5hOut1RToO8jcY1g/Kh41JEesQLOllkv1K5PLNvLpP x285Jn5XxVVQXKuNw+rDszqU+jkjzbvLZDfPaq2aMgnPRGSxZAb/I9wmOyiGesYyxSxY lRxfyoU4PoUjP1UXWnAz8zFTDwa2t2HfVJE/QeJ9jfshcq/uASaGwKszvyLGra9mRlhv cNLfcLl04QhZvAJBEKAa/0IYr4viHFUG1d2PU4F9zTORyOxZnG7jAA4PbkepV8rINUpL ZyDEWlWhMSvMxxpC02j2H6lGvslkiwGUusoj3oNghcK89ZTiVxPUcnnDTjo6T6zv8YOv XstA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5AYZQxxmP/YBrp4PjvflWtpxr3fP9cMnpSDio77cwP8hw3f61+++MKrDPaXuVV3nuMgQWONRHwyZyK7iypxXB7rAF7FIQNEg3F6Scb/Amo4FbWdo=
X-Received: by 10.129.82.67 with SMTP id g64mr3977347ywb.203.1450460566016; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:42:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <56719864.8010604@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09C09@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <56719B42.2040902@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1512160924570.39773@rabdullah.local> <D296DF8F.8DA39%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com> <1DEF233B-FBA8-4750-AB4B-3E0F55822C9E@isoc.org> <D297326B.8DCF8%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com> <CAC8QAcf=yAAGVN35tUCpX38y6_qGstGhK4iYuyhK94LVWrz-+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iL+eAFtGHKXVWMHaqi=3mGO9H1CfE4e=yZCekE9UzPR6A@mail.gmail.com> <20151218171654.GA27965@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151218171654.GA27965@cisco.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:42:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJJn7pWxkct90drfBqLT6cMTDzyPZOHD6R5kwERmKtowA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
To: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d5f3acc833005272faa2f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8TFe23n6yFMwEcKjWcwfKsbRJX8>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:42:50 -0000

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:16 PM Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:10:04PM +0000, Warren Kumari wrote:
> > Yup. I have been to a number of IEEE meetings and stayed in the IEEE
> hotel
> > in order to get the discount - the next 802 Plenary is at the Venetian in
> > Macau. The registration page (
> > http://802world.org/plenary/ieee-802-group-hotel/ ) says:
> > -------------------------------
> > Group Hotel Registration Policy
> > The combined hotel room stays of attendees are used to offset the cost of
> > the meeting. For this reason, anyone who is not a registered guest at the
> > Sands Venetian Macao Hotel for three (3) or more nights is not eligible
> for
> > the registration discount ($US 450.00).
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > The room rate starts at 1,550.00MOP (~$180USD). The discounted
> registration
> > fee is $600USD.
> > The non-discounted fee is $1050USD.
>
> 3000 rooms there. If every attendee could get a room at the $180 rate,
> then this wouldn't be such a bad deal. Seems like the opposite of the
> current
> IETF problem: Large hotel with too many rooms that need to be filled. And
> several other competing hotels in walking distance.
>
> WOuld be interesting to know if IETF ever ran into the problem
> of not filling up blocked rooms...
>
> > The IEEE seems to have many fewer requirements / expectations from their
> > attendees.
> > For example, one of the recent meetings was in the Estrel in Berlin, a
> > hotel which would not suit the IETF at all.
>
> Why not ? 1150 room would be perfect size. Probably because IETF wouldn't
> reserve enough of the conference space, so we wouldn't get a good deal
> with them ?
>

I'm not sure of all of the reasons, but:
1: there is basically nothing within walking distance. When I wanted to get
out of the hotel for food I managed to find a (bad) gyro / curry wurst
vendor. IETF people have repeatedly demanded many nice food places within
walking distance.
2: There do not seem to be nearly enough break out rooms. A number of the
IEEE meetings I attended were in guest rooms that they had taken the beds
out of.
3: The food options in the hotel were quite limited. I really enjoyed
the Schweinshaxe, but after the N days many people would probably get bored
of it...
3: As far as I remember, their network infrastructure was, um, sad.


> Perhaps if IETF attendees didn't demand everything that we do (lots of
> > breakout rooms, walking distance to bars and restaurants, no trains, the
> > ability to install and run our own network, not being in Minneapolis,
> large
> > cookies, specific price points, a willingness to keep going back to the
> > same N locations) we wouldn't have so much kvetching.
>
> +1 on almost everything. I think inexpensive helps diversity, and
> number of breakout rooms is just at the core of our work.
>
> And ++1 on Minneapolis in November again.
>

Yup. I too like the Minneapolis idea (as do a number of other people who
seem to be very active on the list / in the IETF), but it seem that we are
in the minority:
https://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/Venue-Preference-Survey-2014.pdf

 W

>
> Cheers
>     Toerless
> >
> > W
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Behcet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -glenn
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/16/15, 3:24 PM, "Ray Pelletier" <rpelletier@isoc.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Glenn,
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Dec 16, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
> > > >>><glenn.deen@nbcuni.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>    Q- What??s the room block size we are getting at the recent
> venues
> > > >>> compared to what we got at previous ones like Vancouver, or Berlin?
> > > >>
> > > >>There are many hotels in Buenos Aires but they do not have many
> rooms.
> > > >>
> > > >>When we announced on 10 December that registration would open on 16
> > > >>December
> > > >>we said:
> > > >>
> > > >>Registration and hotel reservations for IETF 95 in Buenos Aires will
> > > >>open at 1500 UTC Wednesday, December 16. Hotel reservations will
> include
> > > >>the headquarters hotel and the contracted overflow hotels available
> > > >>at that time.
> > > >>
> > > >>Because hotels in Buenos Aires have a limited number of guest rooms,
> > > >>the IETF has been negotiating contracts with ten hotels.  Hotels not
> > > >>available on December 16 will be announced when available.
> > > >>
> > > >>On 16 December we said:
> > > >>
> > > >>1. Hilton Buenos Aires (Headquarters Hotel, block of 300 rooms)
> > > >>2. Holiday Inn Express Puerto Madero (30 rooms)
> > > >>3. Sheraton Buenos Aires (140 rooms available)
> > > >>4. InterContinental Buenos Aires (150 rooms)
> > > >>5. Sheraton Libertador Hotel (70 rooms)
> > > >>
> > > >>Buenos Aires is not Vancouver, Berlin, London, Paris or San
> Francisco.
> > > >>It's more like Dublin, if you recently attended the ICANN conference
> > > >>there.
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>    Q - Are hotels artificially limiting availability of the IETF
> block
> > > >>>by
> > > >>> only releasing parts of it to the web booking?
> > > >>>        I??ve seen hotels do this for other events.  While the whole
> > > block
> > > >>> maybe 500 rooms, they release them in 50 room blocks as the
> > > >>>        reservation block fills.  This creates the lucky 10th caller
> > > >>> scenario, where if you hit it at just the right time you win.
> > > >>
> > > >>That's not the case here, or anywhere we have negotiated agreements.
> > > >>
> > > >>We strive to contract for 600 on a peak night at the so-called
> > > >>headquarter's hotel,
> > > >>but it depends on where we are. If we are in an area surrounded by
> > > >>hotels, and
> > > >>at lower price points, we might contract for 400 on a peak night, and
> > > >>overflow
> > > >>hotels for another 200 - 300 rooms on peak to get 780 rooms on peak.
> > > >>
> > > >>Typically if we don't get our target room block it's because there's
> > > >>another group
> > > >>at the hotel, or sometimes it's because the hotel is concerned about
> the
> > > >>risk
> > > >>of setting aside 70 - 90% for a group they've never done business
> with.
> > > >>This concern
> > > >>is also typically reflected in the cancellation provisions for guest
> > > >>rooms they will
> > > >>sign up to, and/or when they start cutting back the number of rooms
> in
> > > >>the block.
> > > >>All of which is evident in our first meeting in Latin America and
> Buenos
> > > >>Aires.
> > > >>
> > > >>For those who managed to make a reservation outside the IETF block,
> but
> > > >>at a
> > > >>higher price, we are trying to get you in the block at the IETF rate.
> > > >>
> > > >>Another 4 or so IETF contracted hotels are in the works and will be
> > > >>announced
> > > >>as soon as they are ready.
> > > >>
> > > >>Ray
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -glenn
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> ---
> Toerless Eckert, eckert@cisco.com
>