IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hotel situation

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 06 January 2016 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D6B1A1BAC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:09:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.789
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xo_SlifCaI2d for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BC111A1BA9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3pbRGJ3j7lz3Hd; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:09:12 +0100 (CET)
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bg8p4ooOV1dn; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:09:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:09:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD5CF6000F5C; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:09:10 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca BD5CF6000F5C
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC02428026; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:09:10 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:09:10 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
In-Reply-To: <m2fuyajoqf.wl%randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1601061808000.16282@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF6449900E0@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <CABmDk8n2TFvmoMVa8t3FOGXtKF9GUii=wrEyMpJucAoLzCix1Q@mail.gmail.com> <346B0259-F6BD-4207-988F-950D6C03F7FD@piuha.net> <02ac01d1486a$d0c41660$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <E364AC68-AAF7-4E7C-BD66-794D032A52CE@gmail.com> <m2fuyajoqf.wl%randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cV4i4JtRyWTzA5_-2yU1pbuqVbM>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:09:16 -0000

On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Randy Bush wrote:

>> Avoid places like Las Vegas and Macau
>
> why?  vegas seems an ok us venue.  maybe tacky, but we're not so high
> society ourselves.

Often, companies cannot let their people go to "party locations", even
if they know the conference is real and the employees are there doing
work. Corporate policies banning those locations tend to trump that.

We heard the same issue happened for some people regarding Hawaii

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email