Re: Barely literate minutes

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 28 November 2012 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90F321F8938 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:45:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HerJAU8L0LQB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:45:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD67821F8933 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:45:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.129.24.67] (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2ECC40062; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:49:57 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <50B693ED.7000609@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:45:01 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Barely literate minutes
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <50B5C839.4060909@gmail.com> <59924CD37D50616BA8EB8EF7@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121128023905.0afdcde0@resistor.net> <50B683C4.2030503@stpeter.im> <50B68612.7080107@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <50B68612.7080107@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:45:02 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/28/12 2:45 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/28/2012 1:36 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> IMHO it is the chairs' responsibility to listen to the audio
>> recording and produce minutes from that (or at least check the
>> scribe's minutes against the audio recording). I've done this in
>> the past (full disclosure: not always) and it is a lot of work.
> 
> 
> I strongly disagree.
> 
> Chairs have a high workload already.  A strength of a working
> group needs to be its ability to distribute work amongst
> participants.
> 
> If a working group cannot obtain the services of a participant
> willing to take notes and be responsible for getting wg review of
> them, then the wg has bigger problems.

In my experience, if a lot is happening in the WG session at an IETF
meeting then it is extremely difficult for any one participant (or
even a team of two working on etherpad) to take accurate notes. One
example that I chaired was the second codec BoF in Hiroshima (and
forget about the first one in Stockholm!). However, I think Ted Hardie
and I did a pretty good job with the second httpbis session in Paris.
YMMV. But I do think the chairs are ultimately responsible for the
minutes.

> ps. I'll repeat that I think f2f needs to be essentially irrelevant
> to the assessment of wg consensus, except perhaps as an efficiency
> hack that permits more terse exchanges on the mailing list.

That's a separate topic, but I tend to disagree. Why the heck even
have meetings? And I concur with Marc Blanchet that some WGs really
gel and make good progress in person but don't have great threads on
the mailing list.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlC2k+0ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxlDgCg7oeaVnKObA7LW8aNyIpu7Lnn
DnYAoOQc3TL4TQW+LZD566zseeH7OzKj
=IolB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----