Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <> Mon, 03 April 2017 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385561294B4 for <>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4AuEc8SzNsV for <>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC9B01294E7 for <>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple;; s=MDaemon; t=1491241863; x=1491846663; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=b0JIUH5yAJUElU1CVgtOm3Hoy gAAHdIT1Cwsk08ntVE=; b=qkT8H+SLpIf32HdpXKvKtJtjfc/naj97OstmugvWl rhYipyVbDRgYZ3NAS2+WhjJM6+N0KXgBAfl99YxkoRe/LCyNmLiRlosBIIt92Slg WUk7S3ARr8mFLWCwoA6ShSGw6VfifvMKCeXNuFJ75tjL0gevCqVjYZydr05sVSC3 cg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon;; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=YkmoJ7dtippy6ClqJqQgXXTl6zQxPY2usl02w8t4a3IoHk3IjyGQ8JVO7tJ9 /WvndLAqAXgQhysTGNdciaOl+zLRQb49OBkIOMlcRGoBKFdXln/WkhPf2 B9vU1yvk9QYB3tYMhpgGdOuPIA0oVwJDrkQtC6kRxM549kbpRDfndE=;
X-MDAV-Processed:, Mon, 03 Apr 2017 19:51:03 +0200
X-Spam-Processed:, Mon, 03 Apr 2017 19:51:03 +0200
Received: from [] by (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005401564.msg for <>; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 19:51:02 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-HashCash: 1:20:170403:md50005401564::RUOpJqSAbzn5iUtS:00004jkC
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 19:50:58 +0200
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: <>
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 17:51:13 -0000

I think the “border” line between what is being done in EU and US is that in EU this is only done under a terrorism classification ?

I can ask about this to a Spanish State Lawyer that I will be able to talk at the end of the week …

I knew about the UK case, but I no longer consider UK part of the EU, never has been “totally”, and clearly it should be considered also when we plan new meetings.


-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <> en nombre de Christian Huitema <>
Responder a: <>
Fecha: lunes, 3 de abril de 2017, 19:32
Para: <>
Asunto: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

    On 4/3/2017 9:39 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    > I’m not convinced (despite laws may say it), if computer inspection, even “temporal” confiscation, is being used in EU. At least I never heard about that, and even less in my own country, though I may be missing cases in other EU countries.
    You are indeed missing something.
    Here is one pretty famous case, happened in Heathrow: Greenwald's
    partner detained, thumb drives confiscated.
    Here is a clip about Canada's refusal to disclose laptop search policy:
    Article 60 of French custom code authorizes inspection of anything you
    carry, can be interpreted as authorizing search of laptops or cell phones:;jsessionid=AA678D3E2AC873493D4025F33776856A.tpdila20v_2?idSectionTA=LEGISCTA000006138841&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006071570&dateTexte=20130315
    Various European countries, including the UK and France, have passed
    inquisitive snooping laws. Maybe they are less visible than what happens
    in the US, but I would not hold my breath...
    -- Christian Huitema
    > Definitively if that happens to me in EU, I will not provide passwords even if I don’t have anything to hide, but just because customer’s info confidentiality, signed NDAs, etc. I don’t think that will bring me to the jail. However, in US, detention is a fact, right?
    > Regards,
    > Jordi

IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.