Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz> Fri, 14 April 2017 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <michal@krsek.cz>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D34C128B8E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=krsek-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IaUK-A2GA2eA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x231.google.com (mail-wr0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D5E131461 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c55so53443854wrc.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krsek-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6RA1Zn7wpJzxhomwII2HPNwfn3hv6mkGdkCMQHdKg9s=; b=FVdanLgmx+7ECB3TpS/U2lx0ZCYbv6bwh/7cKehtrFLF/f4FJggOXz5dZfa5nTVvCV vfIx+lVn6Jps/cEhpId7X1ABoWsbjJiQPlLgHh9IaeMIw0XjvypSo+ggbmbo4p/XZ1k7 q9KpHspQe2MEjXdfZFsAOq3zxHq8Y8/z/wxbpfBQMNiAo1MC4DwJ0yMmUSVAbQMM/D2R Byq7KnBL1JY1yMr0x/r8wzFUrZfWhZa4fxuozVLH/PyKJeKO4U3mifaz11RJpVvTqglz eiIWXsAUQgf3EaIgQrdyV1vzs22t9tcliiOTa4nW4IfjGeUF87SRiAOcS67uBRwQ5sm2 KUQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6RA1Zn7wpJzxhomwII2HPNwfn3hv6mkGdkCMQHdKg9s=; b=m1CKwdUvpZ99PLYwNU7E3jkXbwIXpxN6YuVobt2rnlz5CXvUX6jpnRemBm4I6QfteQ KPxOEsarBHayvwSZdlAifCyAdP182EVrvYH/89hF3uWoULGjD8uV9F2dXu5KZym0Xs8Q 8L4hLRwKCraR5t/Vs8BsKYCUEUdexHbnoJYoWfF73RJGcgAOPV3heWHSZ411XxjN/5kb O7JwjoEGgXgBZZmJso4xmmNnCji8COJMT4yMCdtjgB43HqH9c6yYYcYz7wduJzjUBHKt Ar6z5U1PHPLl54kWdWa+cEQYebvOkP/Pu3AfarBmGpJDvztBWC/XZ05gryKjAnKGkSnq 8f2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4qZpg+7ZvjfckUm0Q1hi0jwQx9MM5lf5kqAyNTUxfhRt1EI0qD SqCUXVidAQoQ0l987Yw=
X-Received: by 10.223.171.234 with SMTP id s97mr9149384wrc.167.1492188371670; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Michals-MacBook-Air.local (ip-37-188-238-204.eurotel.cz. [37.188.238.204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l186sm3360129wmd.17.2017.04.14.09.46.10 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <20170404211526.GA25253@gsp.org> <003F08E0-D80E-40F7-AB15-6588B7B140CF@tzi.org> <20170410180555.GA20454@gsp.org> <AF3B5F0A-EEA7-402D-B61E-EDE6CE2AE16C@tzi.org> <8546635c-f838-e7f7-a5ec-3a855a14c0f9@dcrocker.net> <20170411232408.GE48535@verdi> <15694.1491965723@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <f1481391-b477-0596-d8ea-adc02ec48e94@pi.nu> <10890.1492007455@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <04c5e6a6-fe92-20ca-f01e-5c2d17dc6022@gmail.com>
From: Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz>
Message-ID: <2a925214-5235-c629-d19c-a01ef1a89dfc@krsek.cz>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:46:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <04c5e6a6-fe92-20ca-f01e-5c2d17dc6022@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ny77ETqV8Gr7-liR8SryFma0LgU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:46:29 -0000

Hi Stewart,

>> Right, so this is why it's better for everyone to be remote.
>
> Except that the IETF funding model requires attendees to pay their 
> meeting fee.

I believe that the model can be changed, for example remote 
participation may require some small fee too. We need to make remote 
participation as productive as the local one and prepare financial models.

I believe if IETF has meeting to Sydney, at least some local communities 
in Europe or South America prepare their side meetings interconnected 
with the main meeting - and those side meeting organizers may need to 
pay a participation fee - this is just an idea.

             Michal