Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 12 April 2017 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=127550c264=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CDC129543 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHvVk8t8vqW6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D675112EAEA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1492014751; x=1492619551; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=OyMj4F7QvibIx/1YW6rlKEVjV k/UnsVspWzgHZ8U5yM=; b=h5fkpHAAGfEKeuwpVylPTaurpLEoaxR8UYdxh86pZ e3+cKXXD0NxUSwChNta0XUD3mWZfPvJ2e+9VXOPuADV12wJ+mlgYdIH/g6ya0AiG 8lmbV9ofnBmsle5gO1cF7wIdsPeJDGYMvFTWR0A/pgg9EKhWfbQ8tLTSe1n0cLMx gA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=SX7BF5Vv34mjsOucJfNpbUJFZk2e4Zg+67nG3fQCc1I4GAxyBRyITL7VkOck h6qUCGi0ayDa5ydXBFfHQkFWNNQfKtK5faX4W0KnKAfUYrx7lBYsVYUMH ZhfZdnF0vmMe7lKcBApfuGLWgCPafa4pNfQwAv774iIil23qTkN51Q=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:32:31 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:32:30 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005407288.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:32:29 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170412:md50005407288::NmBD/UAA8nNwxCnt:000022lX
X-Return-Path: prvs=127550c264=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:32:26 +0200
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <A8777DA9-D116-449F-ABAA-9AFFEB87CD0F@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
References: <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <2987213d-075e-beff-64f8-d316709c404a@cs.tcd.ie> <20170404204617.GC16732@puck.nether.net> <3D4D193E-0D41-44DD-BB0C-E7741A7A2260@gmail.com> <20170404221042.GC4004@localhost> <7E834C8D-FCFB-48C4-925A-73B5FDEC60FD@consulintel.es> <102DED0B-F1CD-4C65-8AA2-5270227EECCC@consulintel.es> <697AB8AC-BD17-47D6-94C7-B80186500699@consulintel.es> <AD2AF7CA-ACAB-4642-BA6A-FB77423CD74F@fugue.com> <AC7E6A0F-923B-4DF9-81E2-3575EA156F86@consulintel.es> <7c61933d-1cbd-75d6-cdbc-dbf2fa60792b@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <7c61933d-1cbd-75d6-cdbc-dbf2fa60792b@bogus.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sP7oWT10khxldy1TXNDaIpk7aZ4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:32:40 -0000

Hi Joel,

I’ve checked right now the stats of my MTA about *ietf.org and *irtf.org, and I don’t see any bounces. Actually, those are in a special white list since many years ago. So, if you have contradictory information it will be helpful to get that in private.

Yes, I use DNS-BL and spamassassin to score and eventually reject emails which score extremely high (not just bounce them), but this is not related to the way IETF mail servers were accepting and/or bouncing emails in 2015, and NOT RELATED AT ALL to the lack of response from the IAOC, especially if they promised to come back about that.

The point here is the lack of response, not the specific matter.

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Responder a: <joelja@bogus.com>
Fecha: miércoles, 12 de abril de 2017, 18:14
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>es>, <iaoc@ietf.org>rg>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

    On 4/12/17 07:01, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    > So, you mean they don’t use email?
    >
    > Sounds surprising to me, despite for sure they had some time in Chicago to decide about what can be said to the community about the SF meeting. If they haven’t considered that, I guess we need an IAOC with more focus on what is the most relevant and important topic right now for the community.
    >
    > By the way, it seems that they haven’t met anyway since August 2015, as they promised me to respond to one of my emails regarding some spam/email bouncing issues and the way we are managing so, and I’ve been waiting since them. Really nice and respectful way to support the community.
    As a mailing list moderator who sees a fair amount of bounces, It is
    notable that you mta routinly bounces messages to various lists for
    reasons that from from the header appear to be disliking the sender. How
    you run your MTAm since it is yours, is obviously up to you.
    
    joel
    > Regards,
    > Jordi
    >  
    >
    > -----Mensaje original-----
    > De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
    > Responder a: <mellon@fugue.com>
    > Fecha: miércoles, 12 de abril de 2017, 15:26
    > Para: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
    > CC: <iaoc@ietf.org>rg>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
    > Asunto: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
    >
    >     On Apr 12, 2017, at 4:53 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
    >     Do we need to ask again and again every day?
    >     
    >     
    >     
    >     
    >     
    >     Has the IAOC met since the first time you asked?
    >     
    >
    >
    >
    > **********************************************
    > IPv4 is over
    > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    > http://www.consulintel.es
    > The IPv6 Company
    >
    > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.