Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

mike stJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Tue, 04 April 2017 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361DA1270A3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6f-xjxw14ghl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C74DE1292FD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.104]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id vXX2cLJbNT4XXvXX9cHSt2; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 23:06:43 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1491347203; bh=PtgaQe/pp4ruobmZfZdKc5OAypjAREjKwPdr/zdKsw8=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=FvO2dEBD5SH/EBuwx2B13LWO8KrLPT113wMZvtwv3mJQiDvxA6y7IF7dXgEaEqxTs f4mFy6QJCEjFOPImFs0AXht07bONZB7u98untCf2l9dTYbK+BzUVc++GOXUGm5d03b Q71rU49W8+ZBkmBQcUhBWjmAFCMqDuIEJcTVzyKcJF5eJ+5rFy3J2Aiqyji7F/usmm xS5XEwF5tu5c8mNF/Gq6SeyaDExeuF9tRPK9UAuls3hNcso3L4E6GMR4spyhkz6QP0 xoZUW8S6BS5klSrLO/xATBWRBTfzHFDS2Beyy+Vy5se/BhjVXlXJR9LLPIemVcV1J1 ruaboZmy+6tpw==
Received: from [IPv6:2607:fb90:136d:20e3:9973:b2f8:4249:5520] ([IPv6:2607:fb90:136d:20e3:9973:b2f8:4249:5520]) by resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id vXWnceO1ftZO6vXWscyzhT; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 23:06:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
From: mike stJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (14D27)
In-Reply-To: <5DDF7585-8722-4C21-B998-CFD06A44EFE2@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:06:20 -0400
Cc: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7B3FF839-022B-4D58-96F9-1DEDEE0DA3C5@comcast.net>
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <5DDF7585-8722-4C21-B998-CFD06A44EFE2@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPXH2dD+puAaiyduhqjcavA20Kdwjt+HXViPvAxCOYcEbUPP/ESVh8NfMdPQxWdUSSXRnK9/Lb4BG1dHNpqaV8DoawDQgIcHafemPMcvKDeJfI31VBP0 AOlpQ8EOQFO957oNz2jhSQSckkXAZxm8zWBRQokB5yutWLILTmQhRCjygsfMec1qkOoIObOcy8CqvgwqvLR4o5jRJQ6SsknAfeUzfMAt4/3ChF185o22ezYH Z4M6TRoxVDnJl73I4sO+T4QwE9LZEAidAOtxrtUltrY=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/p57nHl0Ucyj7xtKRGNs3iw1bl5A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 23:06:45 -0000

Carsten, you're off by very large factor.   The Chicago murder rate reported last year was 27 deaths per 100000 for the entire year.   That works out to be about .5 deaths per week per 100000 or .005 deaths per week per 1000( the number of people attending the IETF) Or .0005% of the IETF population for the week we were there.  

I'm doing this math in my head while having a glass of wine so it's possible I've dropped or added a zero or two but it is definitely not 1.5%.   It's worse than it should be, but it's irresponsible to suggest that the level of risk was that high.  

Mike

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 4, 2017, at 17:12, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Apr 4, 2017, at 20:43, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> wrote:
>> 
>> In my opinion, statistics will better inform this discussion.
> 
> Statistics is useful for reasoning about stable countries.
> 
> (It may also be useful to remember that the US is unsafe beyond its borders.
> Chicago has the murder rate Colombia had in 2013, before the peace process fully set in.
> Statistically, the chance of any IETFer being killed last week was about 1.5 %.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>