IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au> Mon, 02 June 2014 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23251A0140 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, HK_RANDOM_REPLYTO=0.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99P869Sg_kKT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm34.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm34.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C39AB1A0127 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm34.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2014 03:41:00 -0000
Received: from [98.138.101.132] by nm34.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2014 03:37:56 -0000
Received: from [98.139.214.32] by tm20.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2014 03:37:53 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.205] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2014 03:37:53 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1014.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2014 03:37:53 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 506972.67110.bm@omp1014.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 55214 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jun 2014 03:37:53 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.au; s=s1024; t=1401680273; bh=cabBqbGlIhsoNLtgnqmMkbgvrNQLvh/+5Hp+Sp6YoCg=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4+oYK24AUScZvr/ymbx8hHZWHUSTBowy6Yfk5e2JhaO29IHHP+WrbvxsUxZoI9cms1Hib7wTbsLYxDhDVRK3xR55ilYL/Z6TmKfEf9oyfzg7KrLVPpcCg5Bup8agk3HhKOnBKp1UaVEp2bahXRpmEiVJQfe/iCNDi6Pz8uwg7Bs=
X-YMail-OSG: 7.EaSzoVM1mEsGISYiMDaKg0nnDjvVIlWV6ZQFsXNCs9tlj et3uKg0qFGaK4CyYQMKiuAjjYfMuFxcTsaJzfz_mbn4mAKIAHGggjjgMgib0 x0zbQNkwMgpQuP10tQlG2C9F8_TGOZ7PnevLfKK8OjT_.4Opajw_cvLstb4x JU8PtYSSJVEVcudk.xfLh4o1G_mvPMkqIF65teSC3InHW972spvj.hxjTaLW 0TOnzfiR6kAWJ8r85eNNtCvr9igwUgAhuhV_63.GLlW4zgHvK.DXCVyhX2_a Da7px0GilZTRE_JnJyQFGEEKgASyXQYu28rnsOIyfOlTKDNioMj5rozYoIz9 Qd8AJ2GxMr2AXoUEGan4g6l91dZcqYwFZHp0FAbLN_8eXNdrQJRP9z0IE1lc xK6AYYtrhxUni8Z08EgYTF6u6_9cCnmp1Nku_3MTr5s4ZB1mBAkW_IHybRbK aPLNjthFRip1B71cn5XvWYRSGxKlH5EVzGNYEU7mNVAOhvsi7tGPOGDSqdqt iSHO_aFK0nisQEyA3T6rUNlI9p7v5VGOQ_dNOtYuSe0lC4StCK66fxVRBnsc V
Received: from [121.200.231.211] by web162202.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 20:37:53 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, CgoKCi0tLS0tIE9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0KPiBGcm9tOiBNYXJrIEFuZHJld3MgPG1hcmthQGlzYy5vcmc.Cj4gVG86IFRlZCBMZW1vbiA8dGVkLmxlbW9uQG5vbWludW0uY29tPgo.IENjOiBQaGlsaXAgSG9tYnVyZyA8cGNoLXY2b3BzLTNhQHUtMS5waGljb2guY29tPjsgVjYgT3BzIExpc3QgPHY2b3BzQGlldGYub3JnPgo.IFNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwgMiBKdW5lIDIwMTQgMTE6MzggQU0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW3Y2b3BzXSBQSSBbVUxBIGRyYWZ0IHJldmlzaW9uICMyIFJlZ2FyZGluZyBpc28BMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.188.663
References: <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <m2iooq4oqi.wl%randy@psg.com> <5385762E.5020901@dougbarton.us> <5385AA97.1050207@fud.no> <53864DCB.5070202@gmail.com> <53865EA2.9000502@fud.no> <02dc01cf7c06$cc6a4bc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <97390E9C-460F-4D08-AFCE-E4A991E2B0E4@cisco.com> <46D22F62-3528-4B9D-9FCF-C9C7466A9ABA@delong.com> <20140531104145.GQ46558@Space.Net> <m1WqqZ4-0000DqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20140531214908.10FEE1719BB4@rock.dv.isc.org> <m1WqrFK-0000BHC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <23125E9D-85A1-49EB-ACE6-DB5EAC67EE02@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr0pvet1oOip-Y2Xi_h2mSZfW1R5HtfiAGbDEns0dY-d2A@mail.gmail.com> <2A4B72CD-EDF3-4D11-AC39-B65892F9173F@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr2NH4Kca4EvhjN2XnDbt8F2eS56ipxu3npH9yOh1bmQaA@mail.gmail.com> <F12F173B-9FF2-4EF8-B11E-33AEDA24961F@nominum.com> <20140602013829.875B917236AC@rock.dv.isc.org>
Message-ID: <1401680273.47439.YahooMailNeo@web162202.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 20:37:53 -0700
From: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140602013829.875B917236AC@rock.dv.isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/-GY7-BODMzLwWDDRVMy1ZjM9Je8
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:41:06 -0000




----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
> To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
> Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>; V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, 2 June 2014 11:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
> 
> 
> In message <F12F173B-9FF2-4EF8-B11E-33AEDA24961F@nominum.com>, Ted Lemon 
> writes
> :

<snip>

> 
> All dual stack machines are multihomed.  HE is basically about fast
> failover when the destination addresses are unreachable.  This is not
> hard to do.  From memory BSD 4.2 supported non blocking connect
> which is all that is required from the IP stack to do fast failover.
> 

Fred wrote a very interesting draft on this, in particular including references to multihoming support/discussion earlier than RFC1123:

"Happier Eyeballs"
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-happier-eyeballs-00

"Abstract

   Multihoming in modern networks has problems with differing quality of
   routes.  This note generalizes the concept of happy eyeballs across a
   variety of multihoming scenarios."


> Mark
> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  v6ops mailing list
>>  v6ops@ietf.org
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email