IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sun, 01 June 2014 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2675E1A0025 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 10:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqFY1BHSRX6H for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74C31A0020 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 10:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h3so2543842igd.7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=3ryV+FGCZQqCgF6P2mVSpEkYvhox2vPjlqDTplXYfl0=; b=BzRLWr2kSPj56nsQ7fZkMIc9vntopGKKDvG0RYlRtts4+sZfRRgQkBSmEXUF2jGHb+ AaZSoaIRlbOKQZxlVTJY5WMxC0GGSJxpNSxwuwF+F8CKnrsetutfMD8DpkkmLj1s+K5G Le2c2HNMdXKEZdcStoS2qsl5nP60rpfZ4ahLc2QXsENj9kk239CDU+cA9/3jXMBJevkz XGlEo/bbJ2juFquBJGQ1uR65+AMsj0z+O6d9+zbGkc+2e1BIiO25bXTlZ0D6FPM1/D1S 9SX73O9psGSMGZ3CYiPNTYRWonyeS0KxzuiRyx55NEUj99mtRAC699yXTlvseEQ9cQhX 8jZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3ryV+FGCZQqCgF6P2mVSpEkYvhox2vPjlqDTplXYfl0=; b=VlwOAGA9z8HNbuxUKRfUg8n7E+Z23C4KqAnACzlb94+7BpB62LPs7YNyhBxOjFWtX9 Oq40BdWRGwB9X99986KaCuLZ86i95J+ccaghtY1o0H/2LygpyrsfqDniHRo5qDnc9DRU Qtle6ZwbDBy8Ht8E7REMtiFc0j1/XwQV4N/AIRMD7Hj0KTY0pjXOz189SJD82vqzNmuY pD5HpKwqjoQNoXN4cYGjgtP7gKMcWWWGEcfqHioNKeJ4rg/Zfrbni5OwvGcxO80ainqX bOgmKg2k++MqQS0YlzWVy7sa8BF02/21Pm55NzXrMtP9NOxmLjnIXolRf/wDxddK99DV 9nkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl3d+hoqJ1+VpCGo2uCRyh7woOI8tO3Sj79mhX9GM83IC/VlLujock+tXDKHZ3VBvyEkGY/
X-Received: by 10.42.211.205 with SMTP id gp13mr28307907icb.29.1401644230541; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.18.203 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 10:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <23125E9D-85A1-49EB-ACE6-DB5EAC67EE02@nominum.com>
References: <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <m2iooq4oqi.wl%randy@psg.com> <5385762E.5020901@dougbarton.us> <5385AA97.1050207@fud.no> <53864DCB.5070202@gmail.com> <53865EA2.9000502@fud.no> <02dc01cf7c06$cc6a4bc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <97390E9C-460F-4D08-AFCE-E4A991E2B0E4@cisco.com> <46D22F62-3528-4B9D-9FCF-C9C7466A9ABA@delong.com> <20140531104145.GQ46558@Space.Net> <m1WqqZ4-0000DqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20140531214908.10FEE1719BB4@rock.dv.isc.org> <m1WqrFK-0000BHC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <23125E9D-85A1-49EB-ACE6-DB5EAC67EE02@nominum.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 02:36:50 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0pvet1oOip-Y2Xi_h2mSZfW1R5HtfiAGbDEns0dY-d2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf301d39fc76aecb04fac9bab1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/VTNtevLjIL3BHV8hQGNLT7k5y7k
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 17:37:17 -0000

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> > You suggest that every possible piece of software should implement HE?
>
> Software that doesn't implement some kind of happy eyeballs mechanism is
> going to work poorly on an IPv6 internet.


Because...?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email